From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98F68D7E for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:34:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f182.google.com (mail-ig0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C9A116 for ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:34:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ig0-f182.google.com with SMTP id y8so19453434igp.1 for ; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 06:34:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=8kRdTq4e1o4NmwKiL4cAjQiELVqANdtcahCxMkON9MA=; b=LIwZ6Ij3XCkIZYe9gzTGHOmdsCXo+p4yOnrQuXdBdjty2r5eOEb4jdRnfNokfKjQC6 ZQaygaO2KGZlSqmhkZ8DdliyrlMLHcaT1lYujueiRENCCeamd5GmlkfI5NUBaloVN495 Tap5S5avXy6qEPqjUjqVgC6AepDbuovmP2OzHQwJZblBUz6VzbYSb2wMp8R+9qk1GOpl w4GrUNB1E1bL5EasDjr7q5I0SsvkQsquVFps+kR/ueiZ1znaRhEMrC2YhWbRKllTkZLY k3n84nFLxrSMkvKQpn8HofN+cfyOK4Xdqm2iD2sqr+fpoaumITGsvuj/F66G3Yq1otZ0 d1JA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=8kRdTq4e1o4NmwKiL4cAjQiELVqANdtcahCxMkON9MA=; b=iBYXYQT9V9vuV5Y7wRaeJHNCU1ExLQ0i5nv6hzboMLM0KWXxx54pez8Pyw/xRWV743 hjUH5TwMI7G17114OxV50GxAyH0Red9DhUcSfFwLpC8Se1pbsbXitA7lRDI96lHjK8zU pkmBZ6n4Po05mQlVBlvrUbX8shTK5cnv6yEJDJOwR+f1vVYTG4BuHXn54ro4dHsSh1IY QZuQBlhbZpy8PgBTgvRdaPHPJgh3mTi17UPNshBHgT6LwPNyo1vaCPsXtCjudOwg5eAL At0FDWW/60DWEgxvlqeK9iZiKOWSYeYvk9ViBZhKpbz1wXf/9CFDc0EANKNoyxpGTh0A NPAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIPrB1dqRmHd3HPOwc8ju43hKMxzXF+zGLr539L9bMSjIIEvoksCvEcCZnoErKntqcjyozkbYMrO4Z4rg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.142.103 with SMTP id rv7mr3926960igb.35.1456842853851; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 06:34:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.111.6 with HTTP; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 06:34:13 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 09:34:13 -0500 Message-ID: From: Alex Morcos To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3d4f4cc2a2b052cfda850 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Soft fork for BIPs 68, 112, and 113 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 14:34:15 -0000 --001a11c3d4f4cc2a2b052cfda850 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Bitcoin Core is ready to move towards deployment of a soft fork which will implement BIP's 68, 112, and 113. BIP 68 - Relative lock-time using consensus-enforced sequence numbers - https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0068.mediawiki BIP 112 - CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY - https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0112.mediawiki BIP 113 - Median time-past as endpoint for lock-time calculations - https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0113.mediawiki BIP 113 logic was introduced in the 0.11.2 release as a standardness rule and BIP 68 and BIP 112 logic has been merged into master*. What remains to be done is finish testing, merge the logic to activate the soft forks and backport the code to supported releases. The exact rollout mechanism is still being finalized but will be coordinated with the community. This email is meant to serve as a readiness announcement and confirm that there are no outstanding concerns. Thanks, Alex * - BIP 68 and BIP 112 logic is only enforced when the tx version is >= 2 which will only become standard with the release of the soft fork code. --001a11c3d4f4cc2a2b052cfda850 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bitcoin Core is ready to move towards deployment of a= soft fork which will implement BIP's 68, 112, and 113.

<= /div>
BIP 68 - Relative lock-time using consensus-enforced sequence num= bers - https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0068.mediawiki
BIP 113 - Median time-past as en= dpoint for lock-time calculations - https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/ma= ster/bip-0113.mediawiki

BIP 113 logic was intr= oduced in the 0.11.2 release as a standardness rule and BIP 68 and BIP 112 = logic has been merged into master*.=C2=A0
What remains to be done= is finish testing, merge the logic to activate the soft forks and backport= the code to supported releases.

The exact rollout= mechanism is still being finalized but will be coordinated with the commun= ity.

This email is meant to serve as a readiness a= nnouncement and confirm that there are no outstanding concerns.
<= br>
Thanks,
Alex


* - =C2=A0BIP 68 and BIP 112 logic is only enforced when the tx version i= s >=3D 2 which will only become standard with the release of the soft fo= rk code.

--001a11c3d4f4cc2a2b052cfda850--