> Worth noting that even after the discovery that this hack isn't a real
> use for CTV, Robin still signed this letter. But I will let him speak
> for himself.

Correction and my apologies - I thought (incorrectly) based on a reading
of the last few related Delving posts[0] that CTV wasn't actually
usable for BitVM, but I'm being told that it is. Great news!

[0]:
https://delvingbitcoin.org/t/how-ctv-csfs-improves-bitvm-bridges/1591/23

To me this emphasizes that preserving legacy CTV is a good move now; that
way BitVM can meet its needs while more generic, ergonomic mechanisms
like TXHASH undergo design and debate.

James

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/CAPfvXfJNAh1OiCdQ0K0_8A7OkPPb72jrL5J685j%3D7T5UDtALUw%40mail.gmail.com.