From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17AC9950 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:30:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-lf0-f43.google.com (mail-lf0-f43.google.com [209.85.215.43]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BD813B for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:30:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f43.google.com with SMTP id l188so92621536lfe.2 for ; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:30:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=z77y6WyJokSYDJxOBH7c7tR21MJr1vGZepJ0JVDNQS4=; b=vSVHfl1X5vt86YoAmIa+v9pGzw0BU22gO1kqFn3MN5Fut6+F+w6TJ0ewmKFLhfJUrg 25zNb+x54Wa6ML+PYB0K7tIMyFQ+WqFocPMBE23ninrtoAz0d/TZqmHdPnrJwfnOqXWT M08mYGzfoAE2XfRmxFSUD7nA/mfsFPgnc9bXXPHtjx4gtoWSMkGivyWxFccHX5M+vZ7U Lqj9EC6TYzBQyR2fnjz8qfjAnSyC+8+uE5kgaRCCFTjOlfLF6Oj1TkaNxnY8lUsi++G5 ETUfqzXVUPtIaAc8rd7LJsp+C83VufhYvqlfU8U7BqBTAtoUI+BPuwWkaiBJ796nWMCn +i+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=z77y6WyJokSYDJxOBH7c7tR21MJr1vGZepJ0JVDNQS4=; b=GeqYkh4Adpwk8hz+rp0pTjR7oHfUl+mYttT2p+4GOPn/lvOueumblx+r4Mvo5VR2ZV ZzUj3BuWnC27a6OKrGRZ8eFn2tTIIEQHj2H8D4ebFfeAHwSzqPX+byImZ4WGDvq+VLez lKrJ+GfCZq3TyfDoYG1JutURUuaAFlRE9oKu9qxvPhRXLvurT3aTQpLKu4wBPrlGrHaD 0iih2cMpf7k2Z7mLz8iWKLPXVWBKEH77czkygjdkGsbwBhsHgo8D0Wtx6n4GJquNqeSV nGOhqX4rcC2OEkJJBlMLc2Z1qKRVYiQEH+ZZMYvPKJu06cyLBC//VLQxSCU/sTghg4u0 kN2Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tJhXszYCUuLNkaTyRkurWxgeZhJq1C838d7eoE0NDxrjUQ40bW8x/EHlEQIFsVda31fd8ztQFmy2bfp1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.85.200 with SMTP id j191mr9027887lfb.39.1466681445667; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.180.101 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.180.101 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Jun 2016 04:30:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160623105632.GB19241@fedora-21-dvm> References: <20160621221347.GC10196@fedora-21-dvm> <20160623105632.GB19241@fedora-21-dvm> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 13:30:45 +0200 Message-ID: From: Pieter Wuille To: Bitcoin Dev , Peter Todd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11424d0c915dfb0535f062f7 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Even more proposed BIP extensions to BIP 0070 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:30:48 -0000 --001a11424d0c915dfb0535f062f7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Jun 23, 2016 12:56, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > In any case, I'd strongly argue that we remove BIP75 from the bips repository, > and boycott wallets that implement it. It's bad strategy for Bitcoin developers > to willingly participate in AML/KYC, just the same way as it's bad for Tor to > add wiretapping functionality, and W3C to support DRM tech. The minor tactical > wins you'll get our of this aren't worth it. I hope you're not seriously suggesting to censor a BIP because you feel it is a bad idea. -- Pieter --001a11424d0c915dfb0535f062f7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Jun 23, 2016 12:56, "Peter Todd via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> In any case, I'd strongly argue that we remove BIP75 from the bips repository,
> and boycott wallets that implement it. It's bad strategy for Bitcoin developers
> to willingly participate in AML/KYC, just the same way as it's bad for Tor to
> add wiretapping functionality, and W3C to support DRM tech. The minor tactical
> wins you'll get our of this aren't worth it.

I hope you're not seriously suggesting to censor a BIP because you feel it is a bad idea.

--
Pieter

--001a11424d0c915dfb0535f062f7--