From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75AC47D6 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:54:40 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ig0-f173.google.com (mail-ig0-f173.google.com [209.85.213.173]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAFD97C for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:54:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by igbpg9 with SMTP id pg9so97129147igb.0 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 09:54:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=3X3olvJQilEANzLaKOlODElB3CuyxKBUBwPAaxJ5NDY=; b=BzcxePuO0yRY7KJ+jKQRkaiBqQ5dxtn00uXqt6O/2rWGl6foeN/6kW3bTX3j5ly45L ZgiMPlfjWfQQzQgoNMAeQWFxBWIbi1Vtg81jJAG0cnEdHzFjAvItin5dV+73GbUegx39 IiazPzsMhIL4zUzJ76gOZ2qVwdaZH8XKe9YkQFLRNfj2Vk5DSY81jWENAK1a6obyMrWD pEXJhdTy/Feu+vMM2MOUDazrqQnVLUz/DBxHQ39uETO2xihpULJtTVjeEOriXlr6ZKXN 9C1zCt10WjQTX2Cu+jrnmTJm7svRcOMAtcIAT6iLPYs0Adll1W6xzq8rbicROIz5q9c6 4UDg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.60.68 with SMTP id f4mr5170815igr.94.1438707279378; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 09:54:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.77.201 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:54:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150628195053.GA9909@muck> References: <20150625223344.GA2406@muck> <20150628195053.GA9909@muck> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:54:39 +0200 Message-ID: From: Pieter Wuille To: Peter Todd Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0160b63e52c167051c7f24be X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP65 / CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY deployment X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:54:40 -0000 --089e0160b63e52c167051c7f24be Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Peter Todd wrote: > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 06:33:44PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote: > > Thoughts? If there are no objections I'll go ahead and write that code, > > using the same thresholds as BIP66. > > I've opened a pull-req to deploy CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY via the > IsSuperMajority() mechanism: > > https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6351 > > Final step towards CLTV deployment on mainnet. > > I've copied the logic and tests from the previous BIP66 (DERSIG) > soft-fork line-by-line for ease of review; any code review applicable > to > BIP66 should be applicable to BIP65. > ACK on merging using IsSuperMajority. -- Pieter --089e0160b63e52c167051c7f24be Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:50 PM, Peter Todd <pete@petert= odd.org> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 25,= 2015 at 06:33:44PM -0400, Peter Todd wrote:
> Thoughts? If there are no objections I'll go ahead and write that = code,
> using the same thresholds as BIP66.

I've opened a pull-req to deploy CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY via the
IsSuperMajority() mechanism:

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/6= 351

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 Final step towards CLTV deployment on mainnet.

=C2=A0 =C2=A0 I've copied the logic and tests from the previous BIP66 (= DERSIG)
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 soft-fork line-by-line for ease of review; any code review ap= plicable to
=C2=A0 =C2=A0 BIP66 should be applicable to BIP65.
ACK on merging using IsSuperMajority.

--
Pieter

--089e0160b63e52c167051c7f24be--