From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AF374 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:14:28 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-io0-f172.google.com (mail-io0-f172.google.com [209.85.223.172]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37DEC189 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ioii16 with SMTP id i16so176094047ioi.0 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:14:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=VduOlvkcwzKHrQXQzRbQneLi8CnVQcZRgXLcOiExAKQ=; b=IDqtKgWwdnW3JmAgJh55KpE+hBX2j9gdcj4X2qsL4ZLcelxKP1jNeWeg5GYVuiKVrv 8cq+SKptuNMKualC919Y5jdFNmsPrEF//Ak0gWHwn3pG/As/DFpIECuTAKcEzalRquZ4 CrYqWzS9te+d9FVdviDhhKmd3INDzATGjqARxrd+moisvB/JKSJNGi6v4Bfgiwh2RRvw 953WyzuiK12Nb9EfTuy6Lu+F4jXKSLpF8OzRli+66B+6OV09XxvCDc8RnrxyFHtzD7O+ EXw1jIDZVsLVHJyyQM2lzguUHQ2zCIBZInmHWCxpBAnRZ6hchxVRAgNkJBfe3x6RoJ/J xIWg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.9.137 with SMTP id 9mr22018277ioj.50.1439226867531; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:14:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.77.201 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.36.77.201 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 10:14:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55C8D960.607@riseup.net> References: <55C79FF0.8040100@thinlink.com> <55C8D960.607@riseup.net> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 19:14:26 +0200 Message-ID: From: Pieter Wuille To: Colin Gallagher Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f8f1430c90b051cf81e76 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_DBL_ABUSE_REDIR autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] What Lightning Is X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 17:14:28 -0000 --001a113f8f1430c90b051cf81e76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Aug 10, 2015 7:03 PM, "odinn via bitcoin-dev" < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: Note that I've > been in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic softfork > proposal right now, which can be seen at http://is.gd/DiFuRr No offence, but I think that anyone who claims a block size limit change can be done as a soft fork has some basic reading to do first. Also, please keep this thread about Lightning. -- Pieter --001a113f8f1430c90b051cf81e76 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8


On Aug 10, 2015 7:03 PM, "odinn via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
Note that I've
> been in favor of going ahead with Cameron Garnham's dynamic softfork
> proposal right now, which can be seen at http://is.gd/DiFuRr

No offence, but I think that anyone who claims a block size limit change can be done as a soft fork has some basic reading to do first.

Also, please keep this thread about Lightning.

--
Pieter

--001a113f8f1430c90b051cf81e76--