I believe Luke means scanning chains as defined by the structure, but not handing out addresses from other accounts than the first one.
That's certainly a possibly way to compatibly implement BIP64, but it doesn't reduce all that much complexity. I hope people would choose that over defining their own accountless structure though.
On 04/23/2014 10:01 PM, Luke-Jr wrote:
> Yes, it should scan all possible (under the BIP-defined structure) branches
> regardless of which features it supports.
So you suggest to scan for accounts, show balances but don't allow user
to spend them? Does not seem right to me.
--
Best Regards / S pozdravom,
Pavol Rusnak <stick@gk2.sk>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start Your Social Network Today - Download eXo Platform
Build your Enterprise Intranet with eXo Platform Software
Java Based Open Source Intranet - Social, Extensible, Cloud Ready
Get Started Now And Turn Your Intranet Into A Collaboration Platform
http://p.sf.net/sfu/ExoPlatform
_______________________________________________
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development