From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7176EC87 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 18:08:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com (mail-oi0-f50.google.com [209.85.218.50]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E555E2 for ; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 18:08:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oi0-f50.google.com with SMTP id r16-v6so25072358oie.3 for ; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:08:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dQFDwGT9o1NXs0EoCceYVxo3zvdnsJapRBy4r2oT5ac=; b=RAz1fbSOvR6hhAJ6cdKN4rJ+K572jegAsdrtJ0VdPyM/cHE1ZpkSZENHXgdoAn/AHM Jiw4JKqx5zXquw8qK9zo18x+6HHnjDVmvz0faeWNtRguoewsIdCQHMajYjWKv55B6F8O N8EKuM6nGfAX2hU48FDlCACa1IJKiemXPXFK8kpQq2qI7qfftDkQMPaHEUAYxIhdYUgd /ksrfk8I0EbhRMpbWXJHC/wQ/pM3oPX7nOMFzqPUNahwlJUa/0LGU1yzdXSJtYQM0tPe gtcKRhRPoGS5hH5pmqRfkRKHGKm5MUF25uSIEp7ZF48SlNjujmbSEFazFKXSopkf31Tb 5/6A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=dQFDwGT9o1NXs0EoCceYVxo3zvdnsJapRBy4r2oT5ac=; b=A/4CKc31cwxWyu1gV948JRk+4iqsXOE9Dt4muAAKu76fTshY2j7Q7tm7Lw7KlqHcFp ZMLJVJErJtX5sVcFFP+Rp1Rm6qdoaPIoCJ6/oTbDgBGPbxmcxnpK65XJ0GVfHKDHeSfu VKe0hfAzXDiCPo2lXeP+d4U5ryxuN7yiHqmohib+HDwdoZNQaxiq4oOx8JpM6KTxo2Gb 9MZF2DtKTPlAGAFvJeo/AwFPy0Fp9KekrLcaAz6vmAbUKUMZcBsL9iCiMKdAb3rvczT6 Sblq0tYnJH5fGAzcj6Lh8+/xq8IvvSXfT3DdEF+7hN9cUZDpamz4kbky6cNK/+EG+xH1 M/sA== X-Gm-Message-State: APt69E0ZwOfrGv5NIvfDNfiVUyVlFu/vCHEXNtIi9b1M2FVIK4/smOtX BbDjKWmR8An2lKA7Fvm0cP3iLEutmM0XElndMXD7wvX2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpe1+15juDIv3nR5HtbZ1kUp+7zZHncEheJ5m3Xf44ozXGTHaXqd0m80T0xk04pk7+/IH9MOWw/Ooe0W+yVFPt4= X-Received: by 2002:aca:5545:: with SMTP id j66-v6mr13427786oib.291.1530900515061; Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:08:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a4a:6a89:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:08:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Pieter Wuille Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:08:34 -0700 Message-ID: To: Bitcoin Dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Schnorr signatures BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2018 18:08:36 -0000 Hello everyone, Here is a proposed BIP for 64-byte elliptic curve Schnorr signatures, over the same curve as is currently used in ECDSA: https://github.com/sipa/bips/blob/bip-schnorr/bip-schnorr.mediawiki It is simply a draft specification of the signature scheme itself. It does not concern consensus rules, aggregation, or any other integration into Bitcoin - those things are left for other proposals, which can refer to this scheme if desirable. Standardizing the signature scheme is a first step towards that, and as it may be useful in other contexts to have a common Schnorr scheme available, it is its own informational BIP. If accepted, we'll work on more production-ready reference implementations and tests. This is joint work with several people listed in the document. Cheers, -- Pieter