From: Ruben Somsen <rsomsen@gmail.com>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Formalizing Blind Statechains as a minimalistic blind signing server
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 13:28:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPv7Tjb11yRix4ts76Rqz08yj=SOA1LBzq5E7gkxcrS26Sp=Ng@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Hi everyone,
For those who are unfamiliar, Statechains enable the transfer UTXOs
off-chain with the help of a Statechain entity (trusted server(s))
without giving them full custodial control over your coins [0]. At
Scaling Bitcoin ‘18 [1] I briefly mentioned utilizing blind signatures
[2] to make the entity unaware of what it's signing. I now think this
is the more interesting approach. The functionality can be described
fairly elegantly as follows.
Blind signing server with two functions users can call:
// Start new signature chain
(1) requestNewKey(userPubkey) => returns a new serverPubkey and
registers it to userPubkey
// Extend existing chain
(2) requestBlindSig(userSignature, blindedMessage, nextUserPubkey) =>
returns blindSignature, registers the serverPubkey to nextUserPubkey
The resulting output is a public ECC chain (one blindSignature per
user, one chain per serverPubkey) of blindly signed messages,
requested by users (1, 2, 3, etc.):
userSignature1(blindedMessage1, userPubkey2) => blindSignature1
userSignature2(blindedMessage2, userPubkey3) => blindSignature2
etc.
Assuming the server is honest (more on this below), we can use it to
transfer over the signing rights of a private key without actually
changing the key itself.
The functionality is general and therefore suitable for more than just
Bitcoin, but let's walk through the primary envisioned use case where
we transfer the ownership of a Bitcoin UTXO off-chain. Note that the
server is kept completely unaware that it's handling a BTC
transaction, since it's signing blindly:
- B uses function (1) with userPubkey = B to request serverPubkey A
- B then generates transitory key X, and creates a single MuSig key AX
(key X is called “transitory” because its private key will later be passed on)
- B prepares tx1: 1BTC to AX (he doesn't send it yet)
- B creates tx2: an eltoo tx [3] that assigns the 1BTC back to B (off-chain)
- B uses (2) with nextUserPubkey = B and blindedMessage = tx2
- B sends tx1 to the blockchain and waits for it to confirm
- B receives a key from C in order to prepare a payment
- B creates tx3: an eltoo tx (with higher priority) with 1BTC to C (off-chain)
- B uses (2) with nextUserPubkey = C and blindedMessage = tx3
- B passes the private key of X (the transitory key) on to C
- C takes blinded tx2 and tx3 from the public server output and
unblinds them with X
- C only accepts the payment if everything is in order [4]
Even if the server goes offline, C can still get the money by sending
tx3 to the blockchain.
A and B can collude to take the money from C, but since all instances
of userSignature and blindSignature are published openly, cheating is
publicly detectable (e.g. the server signed two messages from B
instead of one).
Trust can be distributed by turning the server into a multisig
threshold key, so serverPubkey A becomes e.g. 8-of-12 multisig. This
means security can be on par with federated sidechains [5], and is
similar to how ZmnSCPxj replaced the escrow key with a federation in
“Smart Contracts Unchained” [6].
Lastly, by utilizing adaptor signatures [7], the userSignature can be
tied to the blindSignature. In fact, this can be done for any number
of signatures, allowing multiple signing sessions to take place
atomically [8]. This denies the server the ability to selectively
publish one signature and not the other, allowing safe atomic swaps
via the server.
Essentially, anything that requires UTXO ownership can be achieved
off-chain via Blind Statechains. Coinjoin, Lightning channel
opening/adjusting/closing, Discreet Log Contract style bets [9],
cross-chain atomic swaps, etc. Since the blind signing server
functionality is non-specific to Bitcoin, it'll be useful for
non-cryptocurrency related use cases as well, but I have not given
this a lot of thought.
I also recently published a more high-level overview of Statechains
here, which may be of interest:
https://medium.com/@RubenSomsen/statechains-non-custodial-off-chain-bitcoin-transfer-1ae4845a4a39
-- Ruben Somsen
[0] Statechains paper:
https://github.com/RubenSomsen/rubensomsen.github.io/blob/master/img/statechains.pdf
[1] Statechains Scaling Bitcoin ‘18: http://youtu.be/FI9cwksTrQs?t=47m36s
Transcript:
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/tokyo-2018/statechains/
[2] Blind signatures, Jonas Nick:
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/building-on-bitcoin/2018/blind-signatures-and-scriptless-scripts/
[3] eltoo: https://blockstream.com/eltoo.pdf
[4] Similar to client-side validation, Peter Todd:
https://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/scalingbitcoin/milan/client-side-validation/
[5] Sidechains Appendix A, federated peg: https://blockstream.com/sidechains.pdf
[6] Smart Contracts Unchained ,ZmnSCPxj:
https://zmnscpxj.github.io/bitcoin/unchained.html
[7] Adaptor signatures, Andrew Poelstra:
http://diyhpl.us/wiki/transcripts/layer2-summit/2018/scriptless-scripts/
[8] Adam Gibson (Waxwing) separately made a similar observation on his
blog: https://joinmarket.me/blog/blog/multiparty-s6/
[9] Discreet Log Contracts, Thaddeus Dryja: https://adiabat.github.io/dlc.pdf
next reply other threads:[~2019-06-04 11:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-04 11:28 Ruben Somsen [this message]
2019-06-06 0:09 ` [bitcoin-dev] Formalizing Blind Statechains as a minimalistic blind signing server ZmnSCPxj
2019-06-06 5:20 ` Ruben Somsen
2019-06-06 6:31 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-06-12 21:26 ` Ruben Somsen
2019-06-13 1:22 ` ZmnSCPxj
2019-06-14 7:18 ` Ruben Somsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPv7Tjb11yRix4ts76Rqz08yj=SOA1LBzq5E7gkxcrS26Sp=Ng@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=rsomsen@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox