[bitcoin-dev] IBLT & Bitcoin

[bitcoin-dev] IBLT & Bitcoin

[Christopher DeLucia]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 541 bytes --]

Hi all,

While in college (2017), I produced this paper on IBLT applications and
Bitcoin that referenced some of the research done by folks like Gavin
Andresen and Rusty Russell.

This should come with a disclaimer: I have not really looked at this paper
nor Bitcoin since 2017.  Additionally, this paper was not peer reviewed; it
was just for class.

Regardless, I came across it when I was cleaning out some old docs on my
drive and figured I'd send it over to bitcoin-dev in the event it can
contribute to anything at all.

Thanks,
Chris

[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 687 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: IBLT Memory Pool Paper.pdf --]
[-- Type: application/pdf, Size: 522279 bytes --]

Re: [bitcoin-dev] IBLT & Bitcoin

[ZmnSCPxj]

Good morning Chris,

As I understand it, the latest proposal for improved transaction relay is to use Bose-Chaudhuri-Hocquenghem codes for set reconciliation.
https://github.com/sipa/minisketch

Regards,
ZmnSCPxj


Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Sunday, May 12, 2019 9:35 AM, Christopher DeLucia via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> While in college (2017), I produced this paper on IBLT applications and Bitcoin that referenced some of the research done by folks like Gavin Andresen and Rusty Russell. 
>
> This should come with a disclaimer: I have not really looked at this paper nor Bitcoin since 2017.  Additionally, this paper was not peer reviewed; it was just for class.
>
> Regardless, I came across it when I was cleaning out some old docs on my drive and figured I'd send it over to bitcoin-dev in the event it can contribute to anything at all.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris