From: Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
To: odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net>
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 18:20:28 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CF631FA3-03AB-419D-8945-D7E1D4BF53EF@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <557F57B7.4050809@riseup.net>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 814 bytes --]
> On Jun 15, 2015, at 3:54 PM, odinn <odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net> wrote:
>
> I also disagree with the notion that everybody's just ok with what
> Mike and Gavin are doing.... specifically, this statement by Mike
>
> > The consensus you seek does exist. All wallet developers (except
> > Lawrence), all the major exchanges, all the major payment
> > processors and many of the major mining pools want to see the limit
> > lifted
This is certainly twisting words!
We all agree that the limit needs to eventually be lifted - but some of us certainly disagree with the means being used to do so by Mike and Gavin.
Most news publications keep the discussion rather shallow and like to keep the controversy pretty black and white - some of us have far more nuanced views!
- Eric Lombrozo
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5684 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 842 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 0:04 [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Adam Back
2015-06-15 9:56 ` Mike Hearn
2015-06-15 18:03 ` Adam Back
2015-06-15 20:55 ` Mike Hearn
2015-06-15 21:56 ` Bryan Bishop
2015-06-15 22:17 ` Faiz Khan
2015-06-15 22:56 ` Brian Hoffman
2015-06-15 23:05 ` [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork &non-consensus hard-fork Raystonn .
2015-06-16 0:08 ` [Bitcoin-development] questions about bitcoin-XT code fork & non-consensus hard-fork Aaron Voisine
2015-06-16 0:41 ` Mark Friedenbach
2015-06-16 1:17 ` Alex Morcos
2015-06-16 4:00 ` Aaron Voisine
2015-06-17 3:54 ` Peter Todd
2015-06-18 15:23 ` Jorge Timón
2015-06-16 11:29 ` Mike Hearn
2015-06-16 11:20 ` Mike Hearn
2015-06-16 12:33 ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-16 13:33 ` Peter Todd
2015-06-16 13:55 ` Pindar Wong
2015-06-17 3:59 ` Peter Todd
2015-06-25 6:43 ` [bitcoin-dev] " Pindar Wong
2015-06-26 19:30 ` Peter Todd
2015-06-15 22:54 ` odinn
2015-06-16 1:20 ` Eric Lombrozo [this message]
2015-06-16 5:18 ` Venzen
2015-06-16 6:09 ` Marcel Jamin
2015-06-16 9:21 ` Benjamin
2015-06-16 11:01 ` Tier Nolan
2015-06-17 3:52 ` Troy Benjegerdes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CF631FA3-03AB-419D-8945-D7E1D4BF53EF@gmail.com \
--to=elombrozo@gmail.com \
--cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=odinn.cyberguerrilla@riseup.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox