I am disappointed that you did not understand my point of view. Let me
rephrase it for you,
People tipping, buying 0.99$ products and gamblers that need Bitcoin
transactions *more* than the rest of the people will afford the fees that
establish the equilibrium between demand and supply of Bitcoin transactions. The
people are free to use they money for whatever they like, but you should
understand that Bitcoin transactions are not free.
I was merely attempting to point out that spammers and gamblers
would be the first ones that would go away. They would be free to spam or
gamble, but they would have to pay for it.
When a category of users would get priced out because of the fee
market, they would be free to use any altcoin they want.
Please understand that not
everyone will leave. The more important players will remain, those that need it
the most. The other players are free to use whatever altcoin they wish.
În Miercuri, 29 Iulie 2015
16:47:57, Angel Leon <gubatron@gmail.com> a
scris:
"
the
gamblers and perhaps people transacting very low amounts. The
people that actually need Bitcoin would remain."
so
people tipping, buying $0.99 products, and gamblers actually don't need
Bitcoin.
Who are you to say what people need to use money
for?
This
statement goes against the freedom of decentralization and financial freedom
Bitcoin should be able to provide.
It's an open network and it will be used as most users see fit, and
that requires a blocksize increase wether you like it or not, it's simple
physics, other time wait times will become unbearable for those not willing to
pay the high fees, if people leave, then it only mean bitcoins isn't useful, and
if bitcoin isn't useful, it's worthless.