From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AAE6C002A for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 420D560701 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 420D560701 Authentication-Results: smtp3.osuosl.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20210112 header.b=mv7Il+Bl X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.099 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Received: from smtp3.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sK1UJxbYMxB0 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 smtp3.osuosl.org 4BD5F606C0 Received: from mail-wm1-x334.google.com (mail-wm1-x334.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::334]) by smtp3.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD5F606C0 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-x334.google.com with SMTP id n19-20020a05600c501300b003f064936c3eso9243845wmr.0 for ; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 05:27:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; t=1681216049; x=1683808049; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=n1M226QNCGioXRNx5RE6RgdRZRue8PwkUR0DAEU6/cI=; b=mv7Il+Blt4MHmvcyPcTaDNuZi3MIrpWQkntVIFnm46MGf6qZ8YwwQvtrWYi7VOb9/Q L5xLn/HVOFd99vrGhqAhV1KVURYEXlyyN6wc5eJvb9cAJrQSEf0cd4OnrY5kP3OzT/ll t+10hnIXWh+OY47tEqZ0/QWmAERo9imqjV4NlyMCsTIgP2jjLGjGPOX2IUI80XSpHyBv oWxDG+RwQoyHkWTqtjd6C1epkDBjAWAYvb7O9dxn1ESnzCyeAxrlQ5I+cveR99zyAxZM wTSscNju1s+RtRooiDJhzrVTXJNsPSAaKoQxCDdw0/Ko4tpQ/VGE8afOxF4Id8NM2ygn We1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1681216049; x=1683808049; h=in-reply-to:references:to:from:subject:message-id:date :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to :cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=n1M226QNCGioXRNx5RE6RgdRZRue8PwkUR0DAEU6/cI=; b=tx8jf/3HljzmHVq227P7Br1+Ar/w3+Jrc/N5nWh94L2bGnMSHov/zMAYPzMar5WzOA 4H10VAf66KEmm0BurAqeEIZEKYl6zDtd46Yso/SzjPaNsXpc9EzwArKUUOJa5d/4EZlR /pHU0xRdIPjcAEfVDXpn8oifZ/j2kA2nG1JAnLsVTRjshx4pK5wo74seYNm55XbC/117 eRrzihodgxEBoCw/PQQu+DVIPTxqp3aiBrrraPRAnr+UrN13TpkdtULxx7Qo0DC6pFTI zfUgcucqtM4WSQA3cpmMZd2hrdloUnfLGvcfs0tVEpq5je7LA3KJ2vMjvVFnS/tmhZIj WE2A== X-Gm-Message-State: AAQBX9f5oPpQQuWAmQb7cc5VwXKhnWB553mR7fDgFruc6X6oTFEevwMf I6xnCaM+aSNRwHY7NYXPzg5ua7o0XZI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AKy350Y81zoIzlTIQ8JORrSz16DDuB3LCPjgg1v6nYmCqQTmr2cXwczHKsjw5Am21WSknaTY/CdqdA== X-Received: by 2002:a7b:ca50:0:b0:3f0:80cf:f2d5 with SMTP id m16-20020a7bca50000000b003f080cff2d5mr6691789wml.11.1681216049239; Tue, 11 Apr 2023 05:27:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (93-55-83-125.ip262.fastwebnet.it. [93.55.83.125]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h7-20020a05600c350700b003ee9f396dcesm21034611wmq.30.2023.04.11.05.27.28 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Apr 2023 05:27:28 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:27:27 +0200 Message-Id: From: "Vincenzo Palazzo" To: "Murch" , "Bitcoin Protocol Discussion" X-Mailer: aerc 0.14.0 References: <6bb373cc-bee0-13a3-a510-b65d4faa867f@murch.one> In-Reply-To: <6bb373cc-bee0-13a3-a510-b65d4faa867f@murch.one> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:59:43 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Seeking concept ACKs for transaction terminology BIP X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2023 12:27:32 -0000 On Wed Apr 5, 2023 at 8:54 PM CEST, Murch via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Over the years, I have participated in a few conversations about various= =20 > aspects of transactions. Often a chunk of the conversation is spent on=20 > establishing a shared vocabulary. There are many competing terms=E2=80=94= e.g. I=20 > can think of at least three additional terms that refer to `scriptPubKey`= . > > I=E2=80=99ve drafted an informational BIP that proposes terminology for v= arious=20 > components and aspects of transactions. As some established terms are=20 > already contradictory, the proposal does not aim for a perfectly=20 > consistent selection of terms, but rather just to establish a shared=20 > vocabulary to avoid confusion. > > Draft: https://github.com/Xekyo/bips/pull/1 > > Please let me know whether you=E2=80=99d be interested in the creation of= such a=20 > BIP. Make a lot of sense to me, just recently I found that=20 I was using a complete different word to refering to `scriptPubKey`=20 that only me was using :) So, concept ACK. Thanks! Vincent.