From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83DE6C1A1 for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:12:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from EUR01-HE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092065108.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.65.108]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 60AA027B for ; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:12:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hotmail.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=BF0aUTcis16xtTYG1ovtt2+CKp3zG7YCevcMUFfj/o4=; b=iydq+960eQbsM6vyPiZ/GpK0MyPnliCwiuCSvAUINet+AYXkj6zBxBItqna5flO4IIXAhB5f+DmuG9WULVyUy9RwlOVwDbPQnM4cLF0WjxwgqyMs990qOT5RVg81hkKxgNxK47f2jUmIhjhdF3a6OYZJnhGlnd+OB1gpncQvF+uQS8YiAc4up63Tuy2gGwjmPZrTx7P1cviDCo5318veQx6g29k6zbXmFBIR3AY/K7gYIMNxRqb1VBERWLrgD0R46zetpIfqy/eo0zWLlittuEafXCkpTFIlny1c76oGuQ9tJbqELQx7pj6Hd1QERWTGlAdUMEZlEeCA88CcgpBmgQ== Received: from VE1EUR01FT041.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.2.53) by VE1EUR01HT191.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.3.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1580.10; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:12:06 +0000 Received: from DB6PR10MB1832.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.2.55) by VE1EUR01FT041.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.3.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.20.1580.10 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:12:06 +0000 Received: from DB6PR10MB1832.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::85e1:a698:7b7c:a02c]) by DB6PR10MB1832.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::85e1:a698:7b7c:a02c%6]) with mapi id 15.20.1601.016; Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:12:06 +0000 From: "Kenshiro []" To: "bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org" Thread-Topic: Implementing Confidential Transactions in extension blocks Thread-Index: AQHUv5aqK9doshwpj0CV+ZeZH4q9cg== Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2019 10:12:06 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US, es-ES Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:2BB7065EB7BD8AB33770D3A92C4B501ECB1866E98B9D5141C28D9A656CE65509; UpperCasedChecksum:9B199E4705E9748A3A07B85F990374BB6EF82021B205E7F44D1C8CCCA62836F4; SizeAsReceived:6803; Count:42 x-tmn: [TPbSxCn6DCurKmLAF0zQEhRvPBZ2W1b5] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VE1EUR01HT191; 6:ZSj0A6Ihf1ms19Blr7knZ8gt8XHvKVPPNBRqFO3Vvlyjjig+71LHamq64dOnfqBEO8hwPu7K/28Mm20VoHRADkh0l69JWCX+MDQh1lg/9mV1VNiHFrtAdJ0znB3V1OqgmVKgrbaWIC6b4oatzsfXkkKFLGQP7LPvpZMR+vfVNy9FKMlq66l28Ci68ScDK8P3YfHnU8u1C15a7f1PYqv4oTYhOL6yGFZdng8pvXbbKunMAIMv+4ujoKL2DET26FgGwdhBV3C+p5ESqJj+VZ9epiHvQKz7CkNAfPZUWklruvuTgv8JSNEIUlI0OO7FWTGuWsmhrMzj/HjtDKQ/ZQCFCMydspmuUxYg/B9a/0lKlv53FUDXbZdQp9xtCpZTSF3KZLU+6O3vuAXCVG9LwS9C6g8rQtpmuc3rJGojIlYJXG6uMUpKFfYctWeCvMkPFDcehPzpGKDw2kLSlMEQZV6dZg==; 5:yRq1MLFTZl4IhpXUwSyVFvdZ5R1Z6cJDDla8SrLn2CF3T4i21VJW+EMyMn3evKgr7w6VqKLbOLOVJYTiSr7NtHKfNROlim44BsBo28Mca3BfWrrDD4nqzjZk9ihGNQNoSlCAZ1YAI9WwosoX4y9kgsg5/7krD4BQFf8yesYouGzSKylmp4poAymcdbS+H826SGQ8pWEQij0kQ5d1REEhvw==; 7:1Lown/eWMzYW/3FXQ5f+vHiDDTbM42Uf/OxR4M8VYvnhTwmCavkxb9ux/TVfsgmGLRdIln6dAhbCSxz5s6+aHTQ9a9JEIucF0m0KXa6x7Go+2J9k0W3tOnTK1BAZpnIVz6/XdrAyJtuL3GxQc/MGBA== x-incomingheadercount: 42 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(20181119070)(201702061078)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031323274)(2017031324274)(2017031322404)(1601125500)(1603101475)(1701031045); SRVR:VE1EUR01HT191; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VE1EUR01HT191: x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(4566010)(82015058); SRVR:VE1EUR01HT191; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VE1EUR01HT191; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: iOWnxZO+SLpHA+CrmhbzOuk8UXSMzjJNYwKJ37I76I5qv8r7MYKXhFWiSfjpcDYm Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DB6PR10MB183228F27750132F9A6A3542A6690DB6PR10MB1832EURP_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hotmail.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-RMS-PersistedConsumerOrg: d4d70346-2c10-4f39-8c00-e767963926d9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: dc64635c-2cb0-489e-0d0f-08d68dade0e1 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-rms-persistedconsumerorg: d4d70346-2c10-4f39-8c00-e767963926d9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 08 Feb 2019 10:12:06.0847 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VE1EUR01HT191 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 20:17:04 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Implementing Confidential Transactions in extension blocks X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:12:11 -0000 --_000_DB6PR10MB183228F27750132F9A6A3542A6690DB6PR10MB1832EURP_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, What do you think about implementing Confidential Transactions in extension= blocks? CT transactions go from extension block to extension block passing= through normal blocks. It looks the perfect solution: - Soft fork: old nodes see CT transactions as "sendtoany" transactions - Safe: if there is a software bug in CT it's impossible to create new coin= s because the coins move from normal block to normal block as public transa= ctions - Legal: Exchanges can use public transactions so regulators can monitor th= eir activity - Capacity increase: the CT signature is stored in the extension block, so = CT transactions increase the maximum number of transactions per block Regards --_000_DB6PR10MB183228F27750132F9A6A3542A6690DB6PR10MB1832EURP_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Greetings,

What do you think about implementing Confidential Transactions in exte= nsion blocks? CT transactions go from extension block to extension block pa= ssing through normal blocks. It looks the perfect solution:

- Soft fork: old nodes see CT transactions as "sendtoany" tr= ansactions
- Safe: if there is a software bug in CT it's impossible to create new= coins because the coins move from normal block to normal block as public t= ransactions
- Legal: Exchanges can use public transactions so regulators can monit= or their activity
- Capacity increase: the CT signature is stored in the extension block= , so CT transactions increase the maximum number of transactions per block

Regards
--_000_DB6PR10MB183228F27750132F9A6A3542A6690DB6PR10MB1832EURP_--