From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <peter_r@gmx.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
	[172.17.192.35])
	by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DE94167F
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  5 Oct 2015 21:37:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19])
	by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2442D112
	for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
	Mon,  5 Oct 2015 21:37:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.50.29] ([69.50.179.106]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003)
	with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LhOvA-1aMesE2Cu0-00majY;
	Mon, 05 Oct 2015 23:37:06 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Peter R <peter_r@gmx.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAAS2fgTLH2LNKZp1AMO_Gq_ba2KdryyrL8r1bMPQ0gFPAV4GTQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 14:37:03 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <DC9B9DEE-77DA-4EDE-B734-F56412EC3EDA@gmx.com>
References: <CAKzdR-rPoByn=+CgsTc1ZnLkjwtYyJnbQLbn-VHOvz0dLciefQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<2081461.sDX5ARzIdv@garp>
	<CAAS2fgSsJ10P7YYAAsV4P6no3pC=WYozWuN64u=WLSB3h6cHwA@mail.gmail.com>
	<1819769.E416F0XigG@garp>
	<9269B3FB-2ED2-469D-9FE2-783CC2EB252C@gmx.com>
	<CAAS2fgTLH2LNKZp1AMO_Gq_ba2KdryyrL8r1bMPQ0gFPAV4GTQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:PI25jgEcI8zNemDtxWppiHx2aoi8e/ttFxqxFcdxVowROskUbEe
	ti3WXnSKNhcrTDBT4X6GsMp8HVqOdhDfWnixJsf9rfi2anwzinMaiRnb20CBnr7SWaTke7A
	I3JEegMaTj9jafP6kM3mjSyQUACe2OmCj/zATSmc/49MUpjk0RjwJtb6YMSNvV7dMj2Lo60
	J6NdH5I491O0TpBKLoMEQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:qnrwts3GOfM=:a5OkR8C5zbQxM+cHnPFFWy
	V6ugHr/3AwFjwRhO1Q+yerdY7pWkYDYjn3cRgU5gscpTDibDCm2QHbgHOPovSUyC0jSWVBGEi
	oVsIorioSz4+dsLqv6cc7V31sQzdlBKOik7XKLDut4Epzye0oHldYwjFpo4wnZK8G8ja5gFDC
	neIdrQCfAF4jkktVJKtRvQ0Kc+tjvR4WlCxp1FRV3rGMkrMCaEHyhAa5k2+g4JVpQeovPo7hV
	2IXTCPQam6pC+Gqwyx4fiCwKuFKrqwnW+/tPyw0gkhNIQlePOV6iBKO7Y8/KfQUektiNJckPI
	bxjSCJg5JqLxeolniG/BQ9WzMHxpRK4L9GRBVBcppfV3OFibyayiAqdzgX223MH2hXn12u08i
	iSqPpRS6biNwjv35LveToMesKg0Qrru8JzKiHTJt/H/2y4WjKvnw4SU2SmDN/IOoaPtu+MHSE
	+W4h9nusZT69LgylMhByo/gI0lKon4dA+Yal9M+/rZFvLrh6+1RyRsqyWmIzJ/BxZD059v6a0
	UZ3iokk9w2q3rC1J3E1ZRE/F2dGaQcHFK1EmFEbbtBZlBkWStekXEoRfAtCWwrsZBvs89MVoH
	/yQr1DxTid3UtNCypC89fWdktxpXysnPisVWidyoeW5Fvh9K9U2hpoAlqundwEIaF2UDWb8CJ
	2usW55BDMTfrbdJZYJpsYh3aXRKAPaL9oB6lJxiqeeNMmo+M3+Odh8mWcdbEZ+dl2IVLLxfVt
	23EIJjRJHMxpN/kikeU4RMZa164x9tCb+ShA+0746YIjpQLdm3//PIl4KEhOQJyn/fEdGwjI5
	BF2a4dh
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM,
	RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	smtp1.linux-foundation.org
Cc: Bitcoin Dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] This thread is not about the soft/hard fork
	technical debate
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
	<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:37:09 -0000


> On Oct 5, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 9:27 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> Once again, let=E2=80=99s use the current gridlock
>=20
> Allow me to state unequivocally-- since we've had problems with people
> stating non-factuals as fact without getting adequately clear
> correction--, there is no gridlock here and an effort to manufacturer
> one for political reasons will not be successful.

I disagree.  There is gridlock in the Core Dev development process. =20

Peter