From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC40EC0051 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 844AA22713 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RYgRvaVrY25Z for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-40136.protonmail.ch (mail-40136.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.136]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C28E5226A2 for ; Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:17 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wuille.net; s=protonmail; t=1597878982; bh=MCsiL98oNjvB5LKp2E6U10lGDHft77ahLOzQ5gpqceY=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=GzNOEz/3dLc/dPXTovbS1k3OipwdXTxSSvIsFfGvXPhm6kt8osEc2sRaKsKjisBUs 1Gcb7h6JZ00JsP5MFSDPDryvd+obyCW78wf+NOlm1yACUIei6H3df2If3ea01gsnNS PwSo4ZNe9v8YthJkKXiIKk2bVg/gFPoJBUWvoKeg= To: Bitcoin dev list From: Pieter Wuille Reply-To: Pieter Wuille Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 20 Aug 2020 00:03:21 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Revisiting squaredness tiebreaker for R point in BIP340 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2020 23:16:26 -0000 On Wednesday, August 12, 2020 11:49 AM, Pieter Wuille wrote: > It is late in the process, but I feel I owe this explanation so that at l= east the possibility of changing can be discussed with all information. As the responses have been pretty positive so far, we've gone ahead and mad= e a patch to implement the change to the even tiebreaker: https://github.co= m/sipa/bips/pull/210 If there are no other arguments (against), I'll PR it to the BIPs repo in a= week or so. All comments/questions/... still welcome. Cheers, -- Pieter