From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB859847 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 06:26:48 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk (outmail149082.authsmtp.co.uk [62.13.149.82]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05D4A106 for ; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 06:26:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-c235.authsmtp.com (mail-c235.authsmtp.com [62.13.128.235]) by punt16.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7M6Qj3L016407; Sat, 22 Aug 2015 07:26:45 +0100 (BST) Received: from [25.83.116.0] ([24.114.26.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.authsmtp.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/) with ESMTP id t7M6Qcl0041548 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Aug 2015 07:26:41 +0100 (BST) In-Reply-To: References: <55D5AA8E.7070403@bitcoins.info> <55D67017.9000106@thinlink.com> <20150821003751.GA19230@muck> <55D7575B.6030505@thinlink.com> <20150821222153.GD7450@muck> <55D7B157.904@thinlink.com> <20150822000127.GA5679@muck> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 From: Peter Todd Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 06:26:32 +0000 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Tim=F3n?= Message-ID: X-Server-Quench: c21bb52c-4896-11e5-b398-002590a15da7 X-AuthReport-Spam: If SPAM / abuse - report it at: http://www.authsmtp.com/abuse X-AuthRoute: OCd2Yg0TA1ZNQRgX IjsJECJaVQIpKltL GxAVKBZePFsRUQkR aQdMdAAUGUATAgsB AmMbW1NeUlt7XWc7 aQ5PbARZfEhIQQRr UFdNRFdNFUssBmEH Z01CUhl2dgBCcDB1 YkZhECNZXRYocEQu X0pcHGsbZGY1bX1N U0lQagNUcgZDfk5E bwQuUz1vNG8XDSg5 AwQ0PjZ0MThBHWx5 UwcEKFMZSEIPD3YX QBYeBzIrGUAJDw8y MxchK1hUNkIWOUZ6 ClozVBo9Og9aIQRG dwAA X-Authentic-SMTP: 61633532353630.1023:706 X-AuthFastPath: 0 (Was 255) X-AuthSMTP-Origin: 24.114.26.110/465 X-AuthVirus-Status: No virus detected - but ensure you scan with your own anti-virus system. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URIBL_BLACK autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin Dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamically Controlled Bitcoin Block Size Max Cap X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2015 06:26:48 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 21 August 2015 20:21:22 GMT-07:00, "Jorge Timón" wrote: >Don't you mean profits instead of revenue? Actually no. I thought revenue would be a less subjective question to ask, with more focus on the underlying orphan rate question; part of the answer might include an assumed profit margin. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQE9BAEBCgAnIBxQZXRlciBUb2RkIDxwZXRlQHBldGVydG9kZC5vcmc+BQJV2BYO AAoJEMCF8hzn9Lncz4MH/3Z+n1sWPIBSjRebDdZdiFZvJhOYknpE9fzHo2zv6euY qDkQS5uAXbFroF2jrm41H3hjtDXcy0mBIgxhhYMesia8ck9jXb2mXuUlnltBNzgK XeNEWgie1Y2kvXkeq1pXgPLtWWi9W54kQQ9IrpoMpasBMmP8UHh5WuzSqrWFP8Ha HD8smRbByhc6ydEHbVE8FaYxg9ijBIM1e0sh3W+QPgRG8ATAaH6UVJu01YkKHtwS V7PLW0m8WAEH+DAMV54Wgzm6prreQGy3KmldHDF58iMLzescdDIc0Pvotw613rvz 06KgQkQ20ba75XeJQOqXBygGoYS3qHOa9XwVyYq1S7g= =elAX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----