Re: [bitcoin-dev] Replay attacks make BIP148 and BIP149 untennable

[Tao Effect <contact@taoeffect.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1604 bytes --]

Nick,

> Please don't spread misinformation. Whatever you think of the DAO hard fork, it's a simple fact that the Ethereum ledger was not edited.

This sort of email is unhelpful to this conversation, and it certainly doesn't help with the perception that Ethereum is nothing but a bunch of hypocritical Bankers 2.0.

Everyone knows you didn't edit Ethereum Classic, but the the hard fork, which was re-branded as Ethereum, was edited.

- Greg

--
Please do not email me anything that you are not comfortable also sharing with the NSA.

> On Jun 7, 2017, at 6:25 AM, Nick Johnson <nick@ethereum.org <mailto:nick@ethereum.org>> wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:02 AM Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 10:39 PM, Tao Effect via bitcoin-dev
> <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
> > I believe the severity of replay attacks is going unvoiced and is not
> > understood within the bitcoin community because of their lack of experience
> > with them.
> 
> Please don't insult our community-- the issues with replay were
> pointed out by us to Ethereum in advance and were cited specifically
> in prior hardfork discussions long before Ethereum started editing
> their ledger for the economic benefit of its centralized
> administrators.
> 
> Please don't spread misinformation. Whatever you think of the DAO hard fork, it's a simple fact that the Ethereum ledger was not edited.
> 
> -Nick Johnson


[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 5059 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 801 bytes --]