From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A26DC957 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:50:19 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17498D3 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1BFD20D31 for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 05:50:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 03 Nov 2017 05:50:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sprovoost.nl; h= content-type:date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=Xi7jo/GVl5i+ELl6N O4JIQGNh9WfjUSSv6DdfGgCYC8=; b=X8h+ztwpYQz2jSg0XW9ogvDW32asAdxfn 6ERzTR40uZpd2VS8J2TmAHVpFhIbyLmx+86jUj+H1kTMb0aQGE67XXeIEgxD1VV9 +9NLD9D6OZAGaoy/Gq3fxXJz7iSeiKtztxvnLexv0UT7c2EXyd4Iqd3O3h/XxQJs f3Lmrjsbzy3X4ysd59aHuPsMgju3uqAiE/gNWJV50HY4d454TQ8VRbN6v+Tt8DaR Fn/yHHeoObDdN7y3as8LwX+SpNFYPjqSI3VAimDxE1llHjduPdA0S3AY09z9jFv5 /+QtzzAGpF6GLbeHg1dph0SeHdR8RAp50TuihfEMFXMbv2+7ErExw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=Xi7jo/GVl5i+ELl6NO4JIQGNh9WfjUSSv6DdfGgCYC8=; b=ZIXt4Jpu x+OXQp8eXkBBBrNk19dhy8hwRU+JCQ8VEQ1AUNF5y8nyp1Hd0/kQPvwvTjF4RFmo GC2RNDIzheqFY0k1L4OYPuZ0v8c5wjRDN0e3X2by3uJFHMF1PSpg42fukmjgfuc5 k0wWMRFzOXCtfGe4Z4u8yOF7rwnJz6Wcu2EDAMruOfigOiBdX9mB97vJKJQYvyI5 gZ9B6az/P/YIck4Dx0boN2vUybOFyoP4LenZXUf8YS7Q05NsK8mx7wobJK5kqpuX SAnxcEMn6u8WaOB7FB4DuNPlOLKF+5it2qnLXpYgoeu3mGp54eHNruXgvRpUZyFl neT2zw+Ezwo/Vg== X-ME-Sender: Received: from [192.168.178.108] (54693d0f.cm-12-2a.dynamic.ziggo.nl [84.105.61.15]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 910F57E17C for ; Fri, 3 Nov 2017 05:50:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Sjors Provoost Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A01A3E19-923F-4097-92A3-AE35F02C4A95"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.0 \(3445.1.7\)) Message-Id: Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 10:50:15 +0100 To: Bitcoin Dev X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.1.7) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=disabled version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:23:07 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: allocate Github issue instead of wiki page to BIP discussion X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Nov 2017 09:50:19 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A01A3E19-923F-4097-92A3-AE35F02C4A95 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii I often find myself wanting to leave relatively small comments on BIP's = that are IMO not worth bothering this list. By default each BIP has a wiki page for discussion, e.g. = https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0150 This is linked to from the Comments-URI field in the BIP. In order to leave a comment, you have to edit the wiki page. This = process seems a bit clunky. I think it would be better to use Github issues, with one Github issue = for each BIP. One concern might be that the ease of use of Github issues would move = discussion away from this list. The issue could be temporarily locked to = prevent that. The issue description could contain a standard text = explaining what should be discussed there and what would be more = appropriate to post on the mailinglist. Another concern might be confusing between PR's which create and update = a BIP, and the discussion issue. If people think this a good idea, would the next step be to propose a = change to the process here? = https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0002.mediawiki#BIP_comment= s Or would this be a new BIP? Sjors --Apple-Mail=_A01A3E19-923F-4097-92A3-AE35F02C4A95 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE7ZvfetalXiMuhFJCV/+b28wwEAkFAln8O9cACgkQV/+b28ww EAnfLQ//TiJ+9mAetcYVM+ka3rHTMUtv2TCMkH53QTfQi52CmnmEjapRuiUC7Nss C7+ub0CtNXTkwylb/LqxoVOYU9lPsaGNTYyCXN5MOjeeAI9i+cSw4SRs3Jlyzy+6 dQw06B8sQEbQUyTBYCb7bXLQ7XCmSuz/pyplS59lX1lSycUbeT26siI7MF8pHFFd RMHvv/my79oqjG7UmOSP2iXjTlNx+GqqCjrxbYwTy8ITOf1f7lIfTR+Gb3ztBKZ7 Pyp7rZdP3eJxhvCOTDI61La4mnjDiKxDBv+PcdrFfBDylMHYNJmJv9rXxhk1KyyX HmPkTO3PIPviTW2PW3rWLuGASVLI+IG4VxWIJX1QJAGcqkwMcKnRDfE7TBqV+8gW AS3G8J2WRO93ElIAuRzwY/Fjc2EqJ+JfFnoCA2UFM3RAFQqsRTuUY4M3U7hjMydk mZq4n+yV49wM3XawFS6mQ8ag6RxbQbQn3kInprcBuHikko/Pkkdx+xnYSzjyFo9c V4NPwcUmwrhoGZo/MXDsmjBziH9Vg1eTzMi6at9Pu9FzwnG4lH1ttq6CLeKmKASn ibEF2x5ifCTLXt5LF5kDL4SFcMQuwIFCKe1pddY6se0tjof8Vcf94O/64IZB6eI4 EhsiJd9Y+/LBGOydhROUmx887s/YHJLJB7JF3eOnWQZDBnhSQk4= =h7XQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_A01A3E19-923F-4097-92A3-AE35F02C4A95--