From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org (smtp4.osuosl.org [140.211.166.137]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6504FC000B for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:42:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A827415AD for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:42:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H5=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: smtp4.osuosl.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=protonmail.com Received: from smtp4.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M2DuOPQZdpQW for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:42:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.8.0 Received: from mail-40135.protonmail.ch (mail-40135.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.135]) by smtp4.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D9054109F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2022 08:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:42:12 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=protonmail3; t=1646383339; bh=Wgi2JgZ5KB/xX/f5oq0IqQ5wD2EhYirsqI3yPB+Qdng=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:Reply-To:Feedback-ID: Message-ID; b=UgzUj/0mmKnrdWGh69/vbBMmZbX8MZBrxqZTu/LwelB5NmJPdVh97JzKp1WayZEfW Dz3xG/skfn03tAjr5RqeLltt3B+9kLxs6+6FE13R9UM1Vw3MzTYreQJdJNukhU2gKJ SVgNBy/qqc9o+qIwsBPgNqPT/YuP/bIxjFJJ9CAeGYQ0o/e8AOBZx7l88SdJnaVwvv JHBlME/8xo10dTHvf7EedaHOakPmbO2Z++6Vv5yw4wClOIarg55bTcHKKQdIs4hfmF QzFRgd8+pEajPMyKN5gYirgbnyvoq08gUh3yPIFxBbCG7xmdb43XfG75JE6Nu957V2 ci9pNsWuAcXFA== To: "vjudeu@gazeta.pl" From: ZmnSCPxj Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <132721155-8dab92d416edaf63c15cd32201400ae3@pmq8v.m5r2.onet> References: <132721155-8dab92d416edaf63c15cd32201400ae3@pmq8v.m5r2.onet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Recursive covenant opposition, or the absence thereof, was Re: TXHASH + CHECKSIGFROMSTACKVERIFY in lieu of CTV and ANYPREVOUT X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2022 08:42:23 -0000 Good morning vjudeu, > > Continuous operation of the sidechain then implies a constant stream of= 32-byte commitments, whereas continuous operation of a channel factory, in= the absence of membership set changes, has 0 bytes per block being publish= ed. > > The sidechain can push zero bytes on-chain, just by placing a sidechain h= ash in OP_RETURN inside TapScript. Then, every sidechain node can check tha= t "this sidechain hash is connected with this Taproot address", without pus= hing 32 bytes on-chain. The Taproot address itself has to take up 32 bytes onchain, so this saves n= othing. Regards, ZmnSCPxj