From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from silver.osuosl.org (smtp3.osuosl.org [140.211.166.136]) by lists.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77909C016F for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:50:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D0421544 for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:50:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at osuosl.org Received: from silver.osuosl.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (.osuosl.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWZ9iRMdqWjp for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:50:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:06:05 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from w1.tutanota.de (w1.tutanota.de [81.3.6.162]) by silver.osuosl.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355FB2043A for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:50:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from w3.tutanota.de (unknown [192.168.1.164]) by w1.tutanota.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADF2FA056C for ; Sun, 24 May 2020 21:44:27 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1590356667; s=s1; d=tutanota.de; h=From:From:To:To:Subject:Subject:Content-Description:Content-ID:Content-Type:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:Date:Date:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Message-ID:Reply-To:References:Sender; bh=od9FMCpOVvXP/7WizB/Ji9f12x0Jffy6GXDjYMXsj/Y=; b=MY8jRBj0Bsue1dZZu+nAo5zTz7Sbg/763U3KDghi/9TqzF2wUgmD3PL5h6D3dzkA kC4YeJXzhNH4j46Z/22Kc0R4VHfqGEF3W42Jl/CUrSiMzjpeXyITXS0Xz2FjouN+Gtf 3k7hPhuuQsVFEEH8zWdJgl+AR/PLzd9ggDJzhWYI5iPX+kLVpmHRya+59pzRWClKhhO lNwzuzhboDT+65mLBmqIy1Xn819G/vGapgXQyi4S7xmFSG9qXfZ9a6WLqvcklKyp1jF S51wRXNOCMDTX2+XxFWde+sB3bkkBbeufWwu/AULlFCccWFTYRe8EA6PLTepbcoha4G UwN2dWaqYQ== Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 23:44:27 +0200 (CEST) From: prayank@tutanota.de To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_68088_655160920.1590356667683" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 24 May 2020 23:55:19 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Post-mix(coinjoin) usage with multisig and cpfp in bitcoin core wallet X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 May 2020 21:50:37 -0000 ------=_Part_68088_655160920.1590356667683 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have explained the whole idea with a proof of concept in this link:=C2=A0= https://medium.com/@prayankgahlot/post-mix-usage-using-multisig-and-cpfp-e6= ce1fdd57a1 Does it make sense to add such options in bitcoin core wallet and how is th= e overall idea once we have taproot because for now people can check if the= tx involves a multisig address? Reading Peter Wuille's reply here it seems taproot will improve privacy for= multisig:=C2=A0 https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/etagx4/please_explain_taproot_and= _schnorr_signatures/fffljnl/ Looking for some feedback to work on this idea and don't want it to just re= main an article on medium.=C2=A0 Thanks Prayank ------=_Part_68088_655160920.1590356667683 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I have explained the whole idea with a proof of concept in this l= ink: https://medium.com/@prayankgahlot/post-mix-usage-using-multisig-and-cpf= p-e6ce1fdd57a1

Does it make sense to add s= uch options in bitcoin core wallet and how is the overall idea once we have= taproot because for now people can check if the tx involves a multisig add= ress?

Reading Peter Wuille's reply here it see= ms taproot will improve privacy for multisig: 

Looking = for some feedback to work on this idea and don't want it to just remain an = article on medium. 

Thanks
=
Prayank

------=_Part_68088_655160920.1590356667683--