From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2766B941 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:19:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from APC01-SG2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-oln040092253092.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.92.253.92]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B16CECA for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:19:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=live.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=1gK+Su5LDaj5UMx6GYVS8G1Y1ZV8IH/VXWyXvuf+iVE=; b=sRuMAyRiVuNHgdL9wSB5BTZKsXttU3UItptt6TZ52N1WY/uG9L3T1+jderuzqaMM4og+Kufe0eX8ODtrh/4SaJr/K4vl9YgV2ne4yu13t5s+yj67fqRPeQ5DtmBp+XlZ5NR+QFdBgfPJWc5CrJTX4RgGa8tCf6RDsabO9hYOol9jGqCsjQ/SV5hoyiYQuTgaBwet79WbIG1SAY3eDwWWhZ7eDpsVDBkUmOyGwrryLxmEXxkYeeC1ibEQg/a34MAcH4DSFZpMUbXGLvrnaEsVLDEb6CPHKX2PZ756y1qJ278uP6u3TioBjJfIUAeZL0UMzG/vvMxuCc8um18c7kPkOQ== Received: from HK2APC01FT061.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.248.56) by HK2APC01HT231.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.20.302.6; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:19:52 +0000 Received: from PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.152.248.51) by HK2APC01FT061.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.249.105) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.20.302.6 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:19:52 +0000 Received: from PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.171.225.19]) by PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.171.225.19]) with mapi id 15.20.0323.018; Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:19:52 +0000 From: Damian Williamson To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Thread-Topic: [bitcoin-dev] Sign / Verify message against SegWit P2SH addresses. Thread-Index: AQHTcFI5PaOqXF1QmUWXRWYAS68OraNLQkqAgAAGIACAAm27cA== Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:19:52 +0000 Message-ID: References: <52b65bab-ff84-7e21-e35a-f6ebd8106767@satoshilabs.com>, <725C679B-60E2-4E21-9F7D-10F67118D58D@friedenbach.org> In-Reply-To: <725C679B-60E2-4E21-9F7D-10F67118D58D@friedenbach.org> Accept-Language: en-AU, en-US Content-Language: en-AU X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:23FFC948D8C71319A09742303C4D73DB74C93623AF72A67B8168D0DB677A658E; UpperCasedChecksum:FA57C480C7D6082859CB845448B3007664F3B78CD733DA7DD07A6F3305B5A9F8; SizeAsReceived:7216; Count:46 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [gsNBickGwE8B7tZ8z9Tp3IWOfBRp0R8U] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; HK2APC01HT231; 6:JAPk5qKsAGXKN/0vSo9SWQbbCLDxZw8DOBU2OXIl31r3AigjPGjx1Dx1/jJwDieZkAC5Wgj5LCQQm/K9N89k3talI5zoj3ZDdw9ObliPoQeVCUUIDMt9QvczyEStZquT9TzqLSxK+z5y5rsYRhQ0jUFkJ7AjxAtTisPX0ViwiUOzv4gHBSsyrNhmk+IlP1nzsh5La55GzEOMq7uAWw/UVgbjYlPBGZZztVvFI5AQDpjfNG/gPigQvbu4/y0XJmaEjZs/zZQPRQrz8A4qJZhwGttH2vmNM0fSrKQsj3/GQnM/Cj+H9k1XxLGMIBiN2svL40DcJ1UhhG9Bz7LFUbf7hYFLFZSP1z1zm8R6j/LKub8=; 5:nU9joKmUuCS1WQGuTHqBaVMiEOTPGkq7NPsiqZhm2faZ+k4hNlL5NWYSZD7hdFjo4rLYSlLFZyLHMW7RIJaxwkcnGT4z7WPW/ByjTpVfbVq/AyvvP2NTrAovC/lwfGY4Wh3eYzkfxawnxFeljgwechr86Aa0ZOyVGIom13Pc+6w=; 24:I6wwNFrgkBg/ugcd8b+wjgAfqCWAOqqfkSBOcMBOXEOIQ9TReyLp/W4KQQIOIcRh9n11etm37NaT+7BeKWElat/+LAuFXkaJxAVRFb/t7Mc=; 7:gvDAMc+QtfywTh+b0iBtfX5JyQPtT4Art7FqlJygJqjNlUTgYTrUZzcdgVWm+XR/ikX6weYMkPE4nLBkZpBfCitudPS9yghGUyN3rfCyio9/X0wz2ooPiLmUTyLVNz2rxlecLIPSABxfx7Xml6X/hRDEozePWWtWQaZbH74oVCF60xd0GTr9YMp/z/DSI51wdia18qpXvigZI7HUk98pJwF59X2TXlnrVP6d/aL+5AF0buiZy7f48CGzp7sPnIpu x-incomingheadercount: 46 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(2017031320274)(2017031324274)(2017031323274)(2017031322404)(1603101448)(1601125374)(1701031045); SRVR:HK2APC01HT231; x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: HK2APC01HT231: x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: b6853339-a528-4514-eece-08d54864c182 x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(444000031); SRVR:HK2APC01HT231; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000803101)(100110400095); SRVR:HK2APC01HT231; x-forefront-prvs: 0528942FD8 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(7070007)(98901004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1901; SCL:1; SRVR:HK2APC01HT231; H:PS2P216MB0179.KORP216.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_PS2P216MB01795FCE6D61A62EBEA79AD79D0D0PS2P216MB0179KORP_" MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: b6853339-a528-4514-eece-08d54864c182 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 21 Dec 2017 11:19:52.0806 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: HK2APC01HT231 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 14:25:50 +0000 Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Sign / Verify message against SegWit P2SH addresses. X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:19:56 -0000 --_000_PS2P216MB01795FCE6D61A62EBEA79AD79D0D0PS2P216MB0179KORP_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In all seriousness, being able to sign a message is an important feature wh= ether it is with Bitcoin Core or, with some other method. It is a good feat= ure and it would be worthwhile IMHO to update it for SegWit addresses. I do= n't know about renewing it altogether, I like the current simplicity. Regards, Damian Williamson ------------------------------------ Sometimes I like to sign a message just to verify that is what I have said. - Bitcoin: 1PMUf9aaQ41M4bgVbCAPVwAeuKvj8CwxJg ------------------------------------ Signature: HwJPqyWF0CbdsR7x737HbNIDoRufsrMI5XYQsKZ+MrWCJ6K7imtLY00sTCmSMDigZxRuoxyYZyQ= Uw/lL0m/MV9M=3D (Of course, signed messages will verify better usually with plain text and = not HTML interpreted email - need a switch for outlook.com to send plaintex= t.) ________________________________ From: bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org on behalf of Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev Sent: Wednesday, 20 December 2017 8:58 AM To: Pavol Rusnak; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Sign / Verify message against SegWit P2SH addres= ses. For what it=92s worth, I think it would be quite easy to do better than the= implied solution of rejiggering the message signing system to support non-= P2PKH scripts. Instead, have the signature be an actual bitcoin transaction= with inputs that have the script being signed. Use the salted hash of the = message being signed as the FORKID as if this were a spin-off with replay p= rotection. This accomplishes three things: (1) This enables signing by any infrastructure out there =97 including hard= ware wallets and 2FA signing services =97 that have enabled support for FOR= KID signing, which is a wide swath of the ecosystem because of Bitcoin Cash= and Bitcoin Gold. (2) It generalizes the message signing to allow multi-party signing setups = as complicated (via sighash, etc.) as those bitcoin transactions allow, usi= ng existing and future tools based on Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions= ; and (3) It unifies a single approach for message signing, proof of reserve (whe= re the inputs are actual UTXOs), and off-chain colored coins. There=92s the issue of size efficiency, but for the single-party message si= gning application that can be handled by a BIP that specifies a template fo= r constructing the pseudo-transaction and its inputs from a raw script. Mark > On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:36 PM, Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > On 08/12/17 19:25, Dan Bryant via bitcoin-dev wrote: >> I know there are posts, and an issue opened against it, but is there >> anyone writing a BIP for Sign / Verify message against a SegWit address? > > Dan, are you still planning to write this BIP? > > -- > Best Regards / S pozdravom, > > Pavol "stick" Rusnak > CTO, SatoshiLabs > _______________________________________________ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev --_000_PS2P216MB01795FCE6D61A62EBEA79AD79D0D0PS2P216MB0179KORP_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In all seriousness, being able to= sign a message is an important feature whether it is with Bitcoin Core or,= with some other method. It is a good feature and it would be worthwhile IM= HO to update it for SegWit addresses. I don't know about renewing it altogether, I like the current simplicity.<= br>


Regards,

Damian Williamson


---------------------------------= ---

Sometime= s I like to sign a message just to verify that is what I have said.

-

Bitcoin:= 1PMUf9aaQ41M4bgVbCAPVwAeuKvj8CwxJg

---------------------------------= ---

Signature:
HwJPqyWF0CbdsR7x737HbNIDoRufsrMI5XYQsKZ+MrWCJ6K= 7imtLY00sTCmSMDigZxRuoxyYZyQUw/lL0m/MV9M=3D

(Of course, signed messages will verify better u= sually with plain text and not HTML interpreted email - need a switch for o= utlook.com to send plaintext.)
From: bitcoin-dev-bounces= @lists.linuxfoundation.org <bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.or= g> on behalf of Mark Friedenbach via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 20 December 2017 8:58 AM
To: Pavol Rusnak; Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Sign / Verify message against SegWit P2SH= addresses.
 
For what it=92s worth, I think it would be quite e= asy to do better than the implied solution of rejiggering the message signi= ng system to support non-P2PKH scripts. Instead, have the signature be an a= ctual bitcoin transaction with inputs that have the script being signed. Use the salted hash of the message bein= g signed as the FORKID as if this were a spin-off with replay protection. T= his accomplishes three things:

(1) This enables signing by any infrastructure out there =97 including hard= ware wallets and 2FA signing services =97 that have enabled support for FOR= KID signing, which is a wide swath of the ecosystem because of Bitcoin Cash= and Bitcoin Gold.

(2) It generalizes the message signing to allow multi-party signing setups = as complicated (via sighash, etc.) as those bitcoin transactions allow, usi= ng existing and future tools based on Partially Signed Bitcoin Transactions= ; and

(3) It unifies a single approach for message signing, proof of reserve (whe= re the inputs are actual UTXOs), and off-chain colored coins.

There=92s the issue of size efficiency, but for the single-party message si= gning application that can be handled by a BIP that specifies a template fo= r constructing the pseudo-transaction and its inputs from a raw script.

Mark

> On Dec 19, 2017, at 1:36 PM, Pavol Rusnak via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-= dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> On 08/12/17 19:25, Dan Bryant via bitcoin-dev wrote:
>> I know there are posts, and an issue opened against it, but is the= re
>> anyone writing a BIP for Sign / Verify message against a SegWit ad= dress?
>
> Dan, are you still planning to write this BIP?
>
> --
> Best Regards / S pozdravom,
>
> Pavol "stick" Rusnak
> CTO, SatoshiLabs
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev

_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.or= g/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
--_000_PS2P216MB01795FCE6D61A62EBEA79AD79D0D0PS2P216MB0179KORP_--