You cannot liken the ability to scrutinise the public ledger to be the same as hiding information, it is like showing your palm while you are pointing at the back of your hand. The advice that I have is P2SH is scrutable once the UTXO is spent. Also, there is no public ledger obfuscation in creating new addresses, there is a plausible reduction in transaction linkage.

KING JAMES HRMH

Great British Empire

Regards,

The Australian

LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH (& HMRH)

of Hougun Manor & Glencoe & British Empire

MR. Damian A. James Williamson

Wills

et al.

Willtech

www.willtech.com.au

www.go-overt.com

and other projects

earn.com/willtech

linkedin.com/in/damianwilliamson

m. 0487135719

f. +61261470192

This email does not constitute a general advice. Please disregard this email if misdelivered.

From: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev-bounces@lists.linuxfoundation.org> on behalf of Ryan Grant via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Sent: Saturday, 6 March 2021 1:04 AM
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Taproot NACK

On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 8:48 PM LORD HIS EXCELLENCY JAMES HRMH via
bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> My concern was that the more complex scripts allow obfuscation of the Pay To address

This is no different from options available in P2SH, or from the
obfuscation achieved by generating a new address for a payment.
_______________________________________________
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev