From: Peter Todd <pete@petertodd.org>
To: Jeremy <jlrubin@mit.edu>,
Bitcoin Protocol Discussion
<bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: Full-RBF in Bitcoin Core 24.0
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2021 12:52:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yb4fx0ny0tZYKmrD@petertodd.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD5xwhjVkxgu2+M+Ft576GYM6Tv=ZEwtV82v1cLeYaoU5mSRnA@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 990 bytes --]
On Sat, Dec 18, 2021 at 08:51:46AM -0800, Jeremy via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Small idea:
>
> ease into getting rid of full-rbf by keeping the flag working, but make
> enforcement of non-replaceability something that happens n seconds after
> first seen.
>
> this reduces the ability to partition the mempools by broadcasting
> irreplaceable conflicts all at once, and slowly eases clients off of
> relying on non-RBF.
>
> we might start with 60 seconds, and then double every release till we get
> to 600 at which point we disable it.
Making replacability turn on _after_ an expiry time is reached has been
suggested before, IIRC by Matt Corallo. However I believe the approach of
enabling full-rbf _until_ a time is reached is clever and novel.
I'd suggest doing both at once. Long-running txs are certainly useful. But if a
tx hasn't been mined in a few blocks, it certainly can't be relied on for
zeroconf.
--
https://petertodd.org 'peter'[:-1]@petertodd.org
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-18 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-15 16:55 [bitcoin-dev] Proposal: Full-RBF in Bitcoin Core 24.0 Antoine Riard
2021-06-17 0:58 ` Billy Tetrud
2021-06-17 22:28 ` Greg Sanders
2021-06-25 0:23 ` Antoine Riard
2021-06-26 16:13 ` Billy Tetrud
2021-06-26 19:00 ` Jeremy
2021-06-30 14:06 ` Corey Haddad
2021-06-30 19:21 ` Billy Tetrud
2021-12-18 16:51 ` Jeremy
2021-12-18 17:52 ` Peter Todd [this message]
2021-12-20 2:30 ` damian
2021-12-19 18:55 ` Antoine Riard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yb4fx0ny0tZYKmrD@petertodd.org \
--to=pete@petertodd.org \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jlrubin@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox