From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.194] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-2.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1QclsV-0005lY-SL for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:07:59 +0000 X-ACL-Warn: Received: from mail-gx0-f175.google.com ([209.85.161.175]) by sog-mx-4.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.76) id 1QclsT-0004Ao-IV for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:07:59 +0000 Received: by gxk3 with SMTP id 3so1940362gxk.34 for ; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:07:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.91.165.4 with SMTP id s4mr3489817ago.126.1309558071913; Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 173-5-35-131.pools.spcsdns.net ([173.5.35.131]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b19sm3253935anh.45.2011.07.01.15.07.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 01 Jul 2011 15:07:51 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Doug References: <1309478838.3689.25.camel@Desktop666> <20110701080042.GA657@ulyssis.org> <1309524016.2541.0.camel@Desktop666> <20110701163558.GA7311@dax.lan.local> <1309542640.2541.20.camel@Desktop666> <1309557817.2541.23.camel@Desktop666> User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <1309557817.2541.23.camel@Desktop666> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Douglas Huff Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 17:07:56 -0500 To: Matt Corallo , bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. X-Headers-End: 1QclsT-0004Ao-IV Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] 0.3.24 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2011 22:07:59 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Matt Corallo wrote: >It would appear that we are all explaining why we agree...so, can we >get >ACKs on UPnP by default on bitcoin and disabled by default on bitcoind >from everyone (specifically Gavin), as well as ACKs in general on >0.3.24 >coming out with the originally listed things? All sounds good to me. - -- Douglas Huff -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: APG v1.0.8 iQIVAwUBTg5FPEPHkQabDWHPAQj1lg/+K+OfHZXNj/Rn4Ei+OmGjEywTZmOWiFVy 72MvaCNLkx1XW0G3ZJJsy211q5kssvDk4b0qdBraxjT2O7JE6rxEtPkkCaEv8zNv ASpL1AdQ8PpOsYmot9Kl0XC3Hx4fmt89I18KwgEFqywDMssDQT1bWImE3xr628id OHFDRxWv3PQ6unuD0gd0vj4L468il4tzeqnlCCG/bwZACdZAlgxoJDhdGgrpxZf7 zsUBhFwADqZ+KoQ9PJjonXHQj7g+UG2kdz/n3QGPXjAP0eLsqCLJrpJc5t3YEj8c 3bSfbKDGA1djKrXVDOhJ3laZGnIjCBbPuWhnPfoP91S23sFlHxIG9qynrfIF0yMU pMVd9WF98yyjbUEiZon53YGKqBEhjKgx4VLMaYVqT1/kA1vpLDGV4hyqQPsWd3ML LAp0kqBGzlosxX0PbcgQKX2gQ+P+9IjYeKb8XA9VbnLHJYdjZw+pSUz0RYYP3Fws iOrypLgy79dEDyhafllQEAUDQi9XGhgBcpq1r683MD7JL3ip3e1x6LFDZQ9hA9Kk MosjgFMMcCe3R+5bozbTE1Lrsz+ycl5hW4Zi5lszilP8duhvj/InLy/JEpS3qsGc feb5hltQqIEcBItTe/XZCFwROdMjczAl/k65Gk1CSBgDCRda8et9img1t9Z9vGK/ qvwMoWzHcCc= =78gQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----