From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C37E4B92 for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 14:05:37 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.bluematt.me (mail.bluematt.me [192.241.179.72]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5232F3 for ; Wed, 10 May 2017 14:05:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.17.0.2] (gw.vpn.bluematt.me [144.217.106.88]) by mail.bluematt.me (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3A03513AE72; Wed, 10 May 2017 14:05:32 +0000 (UTC) To: Sergio Demian Lerner , Gregory Maxwell References: From: Matt Corallo Message-ID: Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 14:05:30 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Some real-world results about the current Segwit Discount X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2017 14:05:38 -0000 I'm highly unconvinced of this point. Sure, you can change fewer lines of code, but if the result is, lets be honest, shit, how do you believe its going to have a higher chance of getting acceptance from the broader community? I think you're over-optimizing in the wrong direction. Matt On 05/09/17 20:58, Sergio Demian Lerner wrote: > I agree with you Matt. > I'm artificially limiting myself to changing the parameters of Segwit as > it is.. > > This is motivated by the idea that a consensual HF in the current state > would have greater chance of acceptance if it changes the minimum number > of lines of code. > > > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Gregory Maxwell > wrote: > > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:42 PM, Matt Corallo > > wrote: > > at beast. > > Rawr. > >