From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E54C049B for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:59:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: delayed 00:08:13 by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail.osc.co.cr (unknown [168.235.79.83]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A22EFE0 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:59:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.27] (unknown [182.18.252.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: danda) by mail.osc.co.cr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 07D761F033; Tue, 19 Dec 2017 22:50:46 -0800 (PST) To: Nicolas Dorier , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion References: From: Dan Libby Message-ID: Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 14:50:42 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 15:16:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] BIP Proposal: Crypto Open Exchange Protocol (COX) X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2017 06:59:07 -0000 currencyCode and cryptoCurrencyCode seem to assume that merchants will always want to sell for fiat. But a merchant might want to sell for another cryptocurrency instead. Why not make it more generic, like buySymbol and sellSymbol? > "currencyCode" : "CAD", > "cryptoCurrencyCode" : "BTC",