From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08A881427 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:26:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: from auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from s47.web-hosting.com (s47.web-hosting.com [199.188.200.16]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9582F18D for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:26:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34744 helo=server47.web-hosting.com) by server47.web-hosting.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZgIWY-001Xfk-4b; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:26:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 16:26:12 -0400 From: jl2012@xbt.hk To: Peter Todd In-Reply-To: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org> References: <20150927185031.GA20599@savin.petertodd.org> Message-ID: X-Sender: jl2012@xbt.hk User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.0.5 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - server47.web-hosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lists.linuxfoundation.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - xbt.hk X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: server47.web-hosting.com: authenticated_id: jl2012@xbt.hk X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, already matched X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Let's deploy BIP65 CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY! X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 20:26:20 -0000 +1 for deploying BIP65 immediately without further waiting. Agree with all Peter's points. If BIP65 has to follow the 0.12 schedule, it will take almost 9 months from now to complete the softfork. I don't see any good reason to wait for that long. We have too much talk, too little action. Some mining pools hinted that they may adopt BitcoinXT at the end of 2015. If we could start deploying BIP65 earlier, they will have a patched version by the time they switch. Gavin has agreed to support BIP65 in XT. By the way, is there any chance to backport it to 0.9? In the deployment of BIP66 some miners requested a backport to 0.9 and that's why we have 0.9.5.