From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC315279 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:49:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pg0-f48.google.com (mail-pg0-f48.google.com [74.125.83.48]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5441910C for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 14so18503818pgg.1 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:49:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=voskuil-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to; bh=zQ30QFVHmYr3aRULxwgaL+OYhSzd1WTPFH+OinH0Chg=; b=R4983eoz7bu+dqq6eeD1LDP1wTcnMfdTW+J+ay+IbCdr1Wt0F5s6YPMKSTBeG5Ia/r 5p7WlpSgWIGF0Xte1gqgdEUHc2GByFz4RnIS5BVoaNTZiDrXI+ZTbYAeGqjOcCiacUGH BNtVubK1aKvuIYIeKps7a8a5P/t9SqkIPXdge+1CTl9vybg7IcMORQs98H5sOxf4isHo ZKvQB5mg/fA4l0vKScCe4+xiKa/BIoZoz0MBS+QNgym3icdsCLKmeQ7/tmkmSjJXQu00 Nw9V+/hWkj0dbFtWlxJyV1SedqAP8wfblB4A3MOogIhu1njaKpwQW/SmigeaAOerDmco OPKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=zQ30QFVHmYr3aRULxwgaL+OYhSzd1WTPFH+OinH0Chg=; b=PTdmHSo2zeT8PcCXSuUSXsSxKKKTZkjDsvRGqajRGbg023/i2d5y7KTOrSwEmpToIW 6pM7c9b2DW4cq+tz0ubiHSRx715WLnOfLdmUMfFqw5BzWI+LbluG3euXaxdN/1oRYBG0 BcyLwYytXL3xiZ4fs7mvAO1H4DAUfJ2F/tTOC/c8t63zbuWjOPtkOWhMRVBAwji5YdVA uPCA9MetiI21+BoYI8X7bl0RcNBGFyvyEdQtGxLklVOJy17PeV2Qhl0WxKyWXM5ayKSJ pQ8dpeWvuA8qvuG0OXyF7sy2gJigb76DbtX13qH3s0UGrJ7IIsYuoquzSoTIWeBbanTi E3Fg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKn7F00DN+DYVaCUrL+htGso5p6d0DC1FIRxFJ/rygEvKSQY5vrYBs1qYTJZ1DaBA== X-Received: by 10.98.215.85 with SMTP id v21mr77310496pfl.80.1483832941986; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:49:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2601:600:9000:d69e:e8e1:ace0:f3ec:f2b0? ([2601:600:9000:d69e:e8e1:ace0:f3ec:f2b0]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t129sm162477621pgc.32.2017.01.07.15.49.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:49:01 -0800 (PST) To: Aymeric Vitte , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion References: <7169224.bI6Cz5OEL8@cherry> From: Eric Voskuil Message-ID: Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:49:10 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FMVoHrBSwDUI26xOREkig6WTJKcv8regO" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 08 Jan 2017 00:05:19 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:49:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --FMVoHrBSwDUI26xOREkig6WTJKcv8regO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/07/2017 03:10 PM, Aymeric Vitte via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of > full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone > were to control a majority of full nodes The level of control over a majority of full nodes is irrelevant. If this was truly a measure of control over Bitcoin someone would simply spin up a bunch of nodes and take control at trivial cost. e --FMVoHrBSwDUI26xOREkig6WTJKcv8regO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJYcX52AAoJEDzYwH8LXOFOGmwH/1RNH95mdAlwnf61txqkPKmJ YEAPjX70yQYEWqNSARJY3+F+P03pEE/TMT23k17AAfUztX9hYjezjofQ2JgXb/3T pCGDN/viYfmhz0tLwCiE0UBOFE3GERGBKQvyFe+PAXHYrcVUS/t3X03Qy2j9tRl1 05fdUW/59bxErRmMmamPRULuWsmWp9PUL79KCB04PODuSXLXaigOpB83Ibn0uZqb Hx6tLyirppOWUo4VbdXGFqhNaDyHDozwMDHCaGY6mQ1YjEJC5PHw24rNnFaPirY3 mgy/QnQkUEsDlkpf6Mmr+bKc1vPugC2a5CTHpGo4bWn6ymQDraiwmPE9GhHRTRs= =yAFB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FMVoHrBSwDUI26xOREkig6WTJKcv8regO--