From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4156A21B2 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 06:00:32 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-40136.protonmail.ch (mail-40136.protonmail.ch [185.70.40.136]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3B757F8 for ; Fri, 5 Apr 2019 06:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 06:00:20 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=protonmail.com; s=default; t=1554444028; bh=vPQ+AUnH9CWoaQ3aa473ipbMjJfgBZOBB+e/aMiks08=; h=Date:To:From:Reply-To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Feedback-ID: From; b=rRdXBJ9rt/2JNWXzAQBa8+Vs2GvdJS3i4xNofclR+n4Pf60KYqWK2+N6Cm8DdwZn9 9LUQNQrag5ZxdYVQTDkBGfeD1opiqRGJKWoXaFHm1lC0eLJBf/QRO2UknSApL3FW9V 4J3p+3eDPiJYQ4Vv8+JsWX762uQJSpPcjfshc5Fk= To: ZmnSCPxj , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion From: ZmnSCPxj Reply-To: ZmnSCPxj Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Feedback-ID: el4j0RWPRERue64lIQeq9Y2FP-mdB86tFqjmrJyEPR9VAtMovPEo9tvgA0CrTsSHJeeyPXqnoAu6DN-R04uJUg==:Ext:ProtonMail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, URI_NOVOWEL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 12:47:05 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Smart Contracts Unchained X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2019 06:00:32 -0000 Building from this --- It is possible via this mechanism for the federation to be selected by the = participants, rather than the federation being defined as a fixed set by th= e smart contract platform. Perhaps anyone can advertise themselves (by e.g. locking some bonded amount= on the blockchain with a `OP_CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY`) as being willing to act= as trusted executors of smart contracts. Participants then select such executors they believe to be trustworthy, and= what voting quorum of the selected executors is sufficient to convince the= participants of the correct execution of the smart contract. Of course, more choices, more cognitive effort for you mere humans, so prob= ably not a good idea in general. Regards, ZmnSCPxj Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Thursday, April 4, 2019 9:55 AM, ZmnSCPxj via bitcoin-dev wrote: > https://zmnscpxj.github.io/bitcoin/unchained.html > > Smart contracts have traditionally been implemented as part of the consen= sus rules of some blokchain. Often this means creating a new blockchain, or= at least a sidechain to an existing blockchain. This writeup proposes an a= lternative method without launching a separate blockchain or sidechain, whi= le achieving security similar to federated sidechains and additional benefi= ts to privacy and smart-contract-patching. > > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev