Re: [bitcoin-dev] Responsible disclosure of bugs

[Matt Corallo <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>]

I believe there continues to be concern over a number of altcoins which
are running old, unpatched forks of Bitcoin Core, making it rather
difficult to disclose issues without putting people at risk (see, eg,
some of the dos issues which are preventing release of the alert key).
I'd encourage the list to have a discussion about what reasonable
approaches could be taken there.

On 09/10/17 18:03, Simon Liu via bitcoin-dev wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Given today's presentation by Chris Jeffrey at the Breaking Bitcoin
> conference, and the subsequent discussion around responsible disclosure
> and industry practice, perhaps now would be a good time to discuss
> "Bitcoin and CVEs" which has gone unanswered for 6 months.
> 
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-March/013751.html
> 
> To quote:
> 
> "Are there are any vulnerabilities in Bitcoin which have been fixed but
> not yet publicly disclosed?  Is the following list of Bitcoin CVEs
> up-to-date?
> 
> https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Common_Vulnerabilities_and_Exposures
> 
> There have been no new CVEs posted for almost three years, except for
> CVE-2015-3641, but there appears to be no information publicly available
> for that issue:
> 
> https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2015-3641
> 
> It would be of great benefit to end users if the community of clients
> and altcoins derived from Bitcoin Core could be patched for any known
> vulnerabilities.
> 
> Does anyone keep track of security related bugs and patches, where the
> defect severity is similar to those found on the CVE list above?  If
> yes, can that list be shared with other developers?"
> 
> Best Regards,
> Simon
> _______________________________________________
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
>