From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95326481 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:25:02 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wr0-f170.google.com (mail-wr0-f170.google.com [209.85.128.170]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5402D107 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:25:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wr0-f170.google.com with SMTP id l43so49228252wre.1 for ; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 03:25:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s82AsS6QeLZjOKDOH7InYnKXBN11O8oVkVp8EGCTx6A=; b=ZSQ7E7M2LXOw8I8oT4kQqSQ40SQ/l55gJlkVyc5d9s3wPLC6wE3LeQfWjwAViNhQD8 MsR7aHMK/5cCbN0YU6qF7YG3gWcJXsV1UYbZqJ4LOzOb1NMmJ36dpjg5Cl6jzA3p8KIv uqQoAK3RHyaN7exvqC9qNvvfTrS9qn7GQP7NElDzvhzKeC5xyprki0MPg2Ey/rpUAfeZ jlMT3g7vVgs927wW01Tu/EOn+8WfzdWGeHry0ZIwyAVW7wNE8zg80gjJaoT1jsVMkh76 i5ADTF9t77JQQOFwVvgYWaFOpUxA6dQZdrkIMlg27y7OoCjY1fmsi0atUUmkb52569Rl 2hxA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=s82AsS6QeLZjOKDOH7InYnKXBN11O8oVkVp8EGCTx6A=; b=cTFjcVU/DahrN5CXSiU+v24U/Pz52Gkd52LEm8GR6XsJKZasIqjHF79C8PkAqW56Qu ktGorcTDABK8oGPdM/a+C4WJbpDYlf38ygEejMyoK7tGI/jnJcQ5aeEZ1JXeXy7YoYel yZwHk1WxB+ueKtmZgM8NxJ/kiBvmUDAMwWfq4nkjp1CwMxE0nes11v34fElHCS7neg8a /IiEk9yid12peuzvXPyh19GiQyNkM0OS9sSZZgSx6ks8c5hLcW9Hx25RuoXNen6SnfYo DrjJbJitR4MU8hPAle4cEjmTkpdyHBmc3S4dVH7tYj/4W0jACT5cTjTU6FYKHPSVXR+9 eVmg== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H0xEl0eREhhZWnh+A9tktBxmY9+lxuz1I37XaUheoG+SYnYnZgQ9qKL7kl9HHjg1A== X-Received: by 10.223.145.199 with SMTP id 65mr18089712wri.182.1490610299437; Mon, 27 Mar 2017 03:24:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (ANice-654-1-52-124.w83-201.abo.wanadoo.fr. [83.201.223.124]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id n11sm222793wmi.32.2017.03.27.03.24.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 27 Mar 2017 03:24:58 -0700 (PDT) To: Eric Voskuil , Bitcoin Protocol Discussion References: <5b9ba6c4-6d8f-9c0b-2420-2be6c30f87b5@cannon-ciota.info> <35ba77db-f95a-4517-c960-8ad42a633ba0@gmail.com> <9C2A6867-470D-4336-8439-17F4E0CA4B17@gmx.com> <9EB5050D-E54E-4E8B-84C6-95CC1FAC4081@gmx.com> From: Aymeric Vitte Message-ID: Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 12:25:00 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Defending against empty or near empty blocks from malicious miner takeover? X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2017 10:25:02 -0000 Le 27/03/2017 =C3=A0 00:15, Eric Voskuil via bitcoin-dev a =C3=A9crit : > On 03/26/2017 12:05 PM, Peter R via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > > > The repeated use of the term "network upgrade" in place of the > accepted technical term (hard fork) is misleading. This and the > presupposition that the hard fork is coming, and the claims that it's > not your proposal, make me feel like I'm shopping for a used car... > It's not used it's pre-owned, everyone's getting the warranty, let me > see what my manager has to say about the price - it's not my decision. > > This is a development list. Avoidance of standardized terminology and > use of the presumptive close diminishes your message. > > > > The idea was so powerful you were converted (another sales tactic). > Who's proposal is this? Can they not speak for themselves? > > What is the rationale to come on this list (on behalf of we don't know whom) and explain all the details of the "network upgrade" (ie the attack) if this is not to try to get some information to confirm the theory and/or improve it, or some information about how it will be defeated? This just shows that they are not sure about the whole thing, they should stop this now, launch their approximative BU if they like and leave BTC alone --=20 Zcash wallets made simple: https://github.com/Ayms/zcash-wallets Bitcoin wallets made simple: https://github.com/Ayms/bitcoin-wallets Get the torrent dynamic blocklist: http://peersm.com/getblocklist Check the 10 M passwords list: http://peersm.com/findmyass Anti-spies and private torrents, dynamic blocklist: http://torrent-live.o= rg Peersm : http://www.peersm.com torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms