From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7E33CDD for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:56:50 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-ed1-f51.google.com (mail-ed1-f51.google.com [209.85.208.51]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562CB174 for ; Sun, 9 Jun 2019 18:56:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ed1-f51.google.com with SMTP id a14so9050340edv.12 for ; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:56:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=KigdlOC9fmeJSLYHrZXT/aarzhA4APJkCzcKvHWE90g=; b=ms3EgmDUbc3dT496vhzwkGT/jTC51RnMVbUse9v0ifEoMkKZA9SznvkQByt5Ad7dDC w++8aGu/7HagJsMXTpdx87j1Z3E4HGJMjmV/0q9DOu1KpiD+PHuo8dC0KwPLHem1oHMs Jq4ctnPcbe683vJ8aBXNLRkq3g9FlB7pUfpJ4WtKsrsPqmsdg/HcAr2hR9A6UCzz2igG kBh7EE9D7pr0beOOcKDiqIG9cfzAzyf8slIq1XUx9vlafJc7nHJeSSEoBY5dnwAHg9SS ui+39Yla90NAZKVD9Z92Vcy3kQHXSEJcSFeDWg+XZSNqlLK4GmuxotRruWIGPOQjXWRQ 8X0w== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWahNO5w/6Ja1lYiSl6XL5Gn/AFGzdlxWxXLe/f969IqNadzobx WeN0Lm75vkVy35RjltczOmvD4X7D X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwyLp3VJguyZr0MUonOeF2Co9Eq1aV2z6sftpnn59tkN/4Vc3wyuFapoANIIP/Uwn/mmFHBOA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:58cf:: with SMTP id e15mr6414338ejs.240.1560106608741; Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:56:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2a02:8108:8240:4e4c:527d:c7f:2174:340b? ([2a02:8108:8240:4e4c:527d:c7f:2174:340b]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h22sm2272676edr.56.2019.06.09.11.56.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 09 Jun 2019 11:56:48 -0700 (PDT) To: Tim Menapace , bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: From: Emil Engler Message-ID: Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2019 20:56:47 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 21:17:52 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoin-dev Digest, Vol 49, Issue 8 X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2019 18:56:51 -0000 But using the testnet means that you actually need to deal with resets. There were 2 resets in the past but the last was in 2011. Am 09.06.19 um 16:55 schrieb Tim Menapace: > >I don't get why the testnet shouldn't be >resetted just because there is > >a (probably better) alternative for it. The >testnet is still a thing and > >is also used. > > Like Bryan said, lot of miners test here. E.g. new firmware versions, > hardware prototypes and operation services. Difficulty will be on > current levels in a short period of time.