From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 900898A1 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:10:06 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-wm0-f46.google.com (mail-wm0-f46.google.com [74.125.82.46]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14E2610A for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:10:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm0-f46.google.com with SMTP id c85so63419702wmi.1 for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:10:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oqSafcUfWqYpRFtBTFn3gng6cDum+Sv5mY0xh75LOmE=; b=EfjNRg/psm6H5g+KrJ0ScpBTCreVqcjaRA0FAylUriNCGW09LtibxWWZraxYp2FH+y Emhh/KR7jLcmF6cEv4yeKV16lREXxDK4w8dSAdCT+pxjbOlTPt4aW2/LGviv9kjE7JAb K8xTwOeAmtZo+y1a28Toiyyg+bjt9/L/zK2vgsDJfmI6etN/P3sqooH67mt08SGLe+Ey MkzUD5NaJ+3LTrEyk7XCbo8wW1rRSRLExRcURS3opdiUx6hG8RD1WjmFWg+FPkka7Jc1 p249n8UmoW3CWQe75/8xyogPnwHDHAl7VCIRRXlxVf84v3TJ5/0cl14nrWjevTFfQhhd FVFg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=oqSafcUfWqYpRFtBTFn3gng6cDum+Sv5mY0xh75LOmE=; b=Nv5QKLOVFKiNWHsTmIR6m7tWaiHA8g+2UMyvtLQMzx4PhA3vUOCAJfNJLYRpNxFuhp p9OhsQ/Efo3gWcxLHT4RvKJM7E8bPqIywnrgceRISgjSEBny6oFPtio19EqkENHT7R3N wIkuGm8zcOr2q0d7A1tkEL5O2ZZUAAU6Vg9sp32vSdo/5EhRA3OM4Q6KSdJOQlTuHRYk mlP306w/pAKgWtEYMyLgLk9BlhAW8GjIuKiMU6QgNW7HTDUcTK7ytN1sFMXZSDfrnAUx fnF4m8FMNBr8BjEcXaG4YeCcvawwtrFwLdm5auAdB/nBHIofe/7ur9BeYQOd8FZxEksH Hghg== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIpIALXVvyEU3USrDuXY629SaOCqfaJWvfjetNamWTqPgXZ4L5Ihn+IOQeX1crYkA== X-Received: by 10.223.160.23 with SMTP id k23mr6322824wrk.24.1483830603434; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:10:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (ANice-654-1-66-31.w83-201.abo.wanadoo.fr. [83.201.93.31]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id cl6sm115917723wjc.10.2017.01.07.15.10.02 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 07 Jan 2017 15:10:02 -0800 (PST) To: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org References: <7169224.bI6Cz5OEL8@cherry> From: Aymeric Vitte Message-ID: Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 00:10:50 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:18:02 +0000 Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Bitcoin Classic 1.2.0 released X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:10:06 -0000 Le 07/01/2017 à 21:26, Chris Priest via bitcoin-dev a écrit : > Bitcoin Classic only changes the block format (by changing the rule > that they have to be 1MB or less). Miners are the only ones who make > blocks, so they are the only ones who mater when it comes to changing > block rules. Certainly not > Nodes, wallets and other software are not affected by > changing block rules. Unlike segwit, where *everybody* has to write > code to support the new transaction format. This is what we could call a decentralized system, when everybody is affected > > Also, it doesn't matter that 75% of hashpower is made up of a dozen > people. That's how the system works, it's not a matter of opinion. That's an obvious weakness of the system > If > you are just a node or just a wallet, and you want your voice to > matter, then you need to get a hold of some hashpower. Well, probably you did not mean this, this is not fair. "Just a node"... Still wondering why you guys don't care about the ridiculous number of full nodes, no incentive to run one and what would happen if someone were to control a majority of full nodes -- Zcash wallets made simple: https://github.com/Ayms/zcash-wallets Bitcoin wallets made simple: https://github.com/Ayms/bitcoin-wallets Get the torrent dynamic blocklist: http://peersm.com/getblocklist Check the 10 M passwords list: http://peersm.com/findmyass Anti-spies and private torrents, dynamic blocklist: http://torrent-live.org Peersm : http://www.peersm.com torrent-live: https://github.com/Ayms/torrent-live node-Tor : https://www.github.com/Ayms/node-Tor GitHub : https://www.github.com/Ayms