From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1V0F9J-0002EY-0z for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:11:25 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of me.com designates 17.172.220.238 as permitted sender) client-ip=17.172.220.238; envelope-from=jeanpaulkogelman@me.com; helo=st11p02mm-asmtp003.mac.com; Received: from st11p02mm-asmtpout003.mac.com ([17.172.220.238] helo=st11p02mm-asmtp003.mac.com) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) id 1V0F9F-00017X-Fx for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:11:25 +0000 Received: from st11p02mm-spool001.mac.com ([17.172.220.246]) by st11p02mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Jan 3 2012)) with ESMTP id <0MQ700MOB3UE8M10@st11p02mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:11:07 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-07-19_07:2013-07-19, 2013-07-19, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1305010000 definitions=main-1307190141 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_nWxIQ/9JeNC9CMevxlmUrQ)" Received: from localhost ([17.172.220.223]) by st11p02mm-spool001.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-23.01(7.0.4.23.0) 64bit (built Aug 10 2011)) with ESMTP id <0MQ700A793UHOV30@st11p02mm-spool001.mac.com>; Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:11:05 +0000 (GMT) To: "Andreas M. Antonopoulos" , bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net From: Jean-Paul Kogelman Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:11:05 +0000 (GMT) X-Mailer: iCloud Mail (1R) X-Originating-IP: [159.153.138.53] Message-id: In-reply-to: X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record 1.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars X-Headers-End: 1V0F9F-00017X-Fx Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] [RFC] Proposal: Base58 encoded HD Wallet master seed with optional encryption X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 18:11:25 -0000 --Boundary_(ID_nWxIQ/9JeNC9CMevxlmUrQ) Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable =0AI do, but it's currently not in shippable form. Would the encoding / de= coding functions suffice?=0A=0Ajp=0A=0A=0AOn Jul 19, 2013, at 10:54 AM, "A= ndreas M. Antonopoulos" wrote:=0A=0AJean-Paul,=0A= =0AVery interesting. I have a beta BIP0038 compliant paper wallet and I'm = working on BIP0032 paper wallets at the moment. =0A=0AThis is definitely n= ecessary and a great approach to combine BIP0038 and BIP0032. =0A=0ADo you= have reference code?=0A=0A=0AOn Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Jean-Paul = Kogelman wrote:=0A=0AHi everyone,=0A=0AI'm looki= ng for feedback on the proposal below.=0A=0AKind regards,=0A=0AJean-Paul=0A= =0A---=0ABIP:=A0=0ATitle: Base58 encoded HD Wallet master seed with option= al encryption=0AAuthor: Jean-Paul Kogelman=0AStatus: Draft=0AType: Informa= tional=0ACreated: 17-07-2013=0A=0A...= --Boundary_(ID_nWxIQ/9JeNC9CMevxlmUrQ) Content-type: multipart/related; boundary="Boundary_(ID_tbFMPCH69cB5/F2+QzrmYQ)"; type="text/html" --Boundary_(ID_tbFMPCH69cB5/F2+QzrmYQ) Content-type: text/html; CHARSET=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

I do, but it's currently not in shippable form. Would = the encoding / decoding functions suffice?

jp


On Jul 19, 2013, at 10:54 AM, "Andreas M. Antonopoulos" <= ;andreas@rooteleven.com> wrote:

Jean-Paul,
Very interesting. I have a beta BIP0038 compliant paper wallet= and I'm working on BIP0032 paper wallets at the moment.
This is definitely necessary and a great approach to combine BIP00= 38 and BIP0032.

Do you have reference code?


On Fri, Jul 19, 20= 13 at 10:46 AM, Jean-Paul Kogelman <jeanpaulkogelman@me.com> wrote:

Hi everyone,

<= /div>
I'm looking for feedback on the proposal below.

Kind regards,

Jean-Paul

---
BIP: 
Title: Base58 encoded HD Walle= t master seed with optional encryption
Author: Jean-Paul Kogelma= n
Status: Draft
Type: Informational
Created:= 17-07-2013

...
= --Boundary_(ID_tbFMPCH69cB5/F2+QzrmYQ)-- --Boundary_(ID_nWxIQ/9JeNC9CMevxlmUrQ)--