From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C87CEEE for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:41:57 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com [209.85.220.46]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F8452C0 for ; Fri, 4 Sep 2015 18:41:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pacfv12 with SMTP id fv12so32303894pac.2 for ; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:41:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:reply-to:user-agent :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RHXxlAi3DsoRvbBrmHp5/qSAm52cGxd/f4Fr2JKvGj0=; b=x/DUPWN9DfA5mgq07G5FDYEKp39pB4uDIK5dHgEnKAGqR/oLkpAPQFZcbS9yUlJIVP y8Peh6oEDPsxg5y2dsqY1ocGS8fKtf9I+dsTtPUH3tYvqkk33phWMMBEYfRv5Dp6bC5F imV1vWD8/3St0ofXiVd10IRSigw3S5P36HbKWFGnSHfHuWD6az42X9ngqQdpHDeMNA0g 57xa73kfQDEn84hask/6FhKwfYpcHBJOIxRtgMBqY1y8qnOyQUS070F79/ZCC2XkL8ab L0KeqF6k8lbjCwPtG/QL9uOH4tnSqZOhOnGT2Fn5kOS+Avx46Ck+JoxsKlquWYFC59mg Tuug== X-Received: by 10.68.100.226 with SMTP id fb2mr11250208pbb.92.1441392115096; Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:41:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.108] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com. [76.167.237.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id qh2sm3321394pbc.7.2015.09.04.11.41.53 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 04 Sep 2015 11:41:54 -0700 (PDT) From: "Eric Lombrozo" To: "Gregory Maxwell" , "Bitcoin Dev" Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:41:52 +0000 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: Reply-To: "Eric Lombrozo" User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.23181.0 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for request assignment X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2015 18:41:57 -0000 I think it's a reasonable approach. Once the number is assigned, the=20 change is made and the pull request is updated. Only thing is it would be nice to be able to indicate which pull=20 requests are number requests and which pull requests are ready for=20 merging. Perhaps we should make a special label for number requests. - Eric ------ Original Message ------ From: "Gregory Maxwell via bitcoin-dev"=20 To: "Bitcoin Dev" Sent: 9/3/2015 4:18:08 PM Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Proposed minor change to BIP 01 to use a PR for=20 request assignment >The process in BIP01 was written when we used a different solution for >storing and presenting BIPs. > >I'm thinking of suggesting that the number request process be changed >to opening a pull req with BIP text with no number (e.g. just using >the authors name and an index as the number) as the mechenism to >request number assignment. > >Is there any reason that anyone would find this objectionable? > >(Please do not respond to this message with anything but a strictly >directed answer to that question, start a new thread for a different >subject. Thanks!) >_______________________________________________ >bitcoin-dev mailing list >bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org >https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev