From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org
[172.17.192.35])
by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEBE786
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:40:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-Greylist: whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6
Received: from mail-pa0-f48.google.com (mail-pa0-f48.google.com
[209.85.220.48])
by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52278140
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:40:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pabfh17 with SMTP id fh17so7345021pab.0
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 03:40:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:reply-to:user-agent:mime-version
:content-type; bh=k75lQMBmFXw+7POSNaCyZEzV5l7Xcl8XwkNINwaKu08=;
b=ZHF7diPXleIUUIXUYh0/m8zqA/9dAjkSHQuBsA2w1LFDSnrfuD8KX1UcYbZKSzjhYt
guzkLLo62HUJw11RW/VYSNIufFVi8m5KpAFh4BuTVtFhv5pmQm/1q+Dr4P/CnztsE3vh
6/6oltpqK3bl1PEyAOIQ/SJwLNdLXUzX29c2bt2NShrxzkEpX4hLZudHZA1IepLFfufy
Er0EfLSta8aWd+BIdGtVqU/QdWMClgjTS4IecXycdMnwcZX8DqOcyTHCPL4mn+IJ415w
07Thy95qfMRXNoeygUKazCWP4NmryeizUi4q5J4ZoJdOKCKmQ97n3KqIHwKlE5Ub6qk4
Y/dg==
X-Received: by 10.68.142.197 with SMTP id ry5mr44280104pbb.77.1447760454058;
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 03:40:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.108] (cpe-76-167-237-202.san.res.rr.com.
[76.167.237.202]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id
qn5sm42588008pac.41.2015.11.17.03.40.53
for <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
(version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128);
Tue, 17 Nov 2015 03:40:53 -0800 (PST)
From: "Eric Lombrozo" <elombrozo@gmail.com>
To: bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:40:43 +0000
Message-Id: <em58ec03b8-7af4-4643-9414-679acc07fcba@platinum>
Reply-To: "Eric Lombrozo" <elombrozo@gmail.com>
User-Agent: eM_Client/6.0.23181.0
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------=_MBECF4C1A7-5E56-4DB8-A11A-F643DB5BF451"
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
smtp1.linux-foundation.org
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 12:57:56 +0000
Subject: [bitcoin-dev] Dynamic Hierarchical Deterministic Key Trees
X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion <bitcoin-dev.lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/options/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev>,
<mailto:bitcoin-dev-request@lists.linuxfoundation.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 11:40:56 -0000
--------=_MBECF4C1A7-5E56-4DB8-A11A-F643DB5BF451
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've submitted a BIP proposal that solves the issue of needing to=20
predefine HD wallet structures and not being able to arbitrarily nest=20
deeper levels. Comments appreciated.
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/242
- Eric
--------=_MBECF4C1A7-5E56-4DB8-A11A-F643DB5BF451
Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><HEAD>
<STYLE id=3DeMClientCss>BLOCKQUOTE.cite {
PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccccc 1px solid; PADD=
ING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px
}
BLOCKQUOTE.cite2 {
PADDING-TOP: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 10px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #cccc=
cc 1px solid; MARGIN-TOP: 3px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px
}
.plain PRE {
FONT-SIZE: 100%; FONT-FAMILY: monospace; WHITE-SPACE: pre-wrap; FONT-WEIGH=
T: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal
}
.plain TT {
FONT-SIZE: 100%; FONT-FAMILY: monospace; WHITE-SPACE: pre-wrap; FONT-WEIGH=
T: normal; FONT-STYLE: normal
}
A IMG {
BORDER-TOP: 0px; BORDER-RIGHT: 0px; BORDER-BOTTOM: 0px; BORDER-LEFT: 0px
}
#xf3c7c6ec2df14522b27820043e30be7f {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
.plain PRE {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
.plain TT {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
BODY {
FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma
}
</STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY><SPAN id=3Dxf3c7c6ec2df14522b27820043e30be7f>
<DIV>I've submitted a BIP proposal that solves the issue of needing to pred=
efine HD wallet structures and not being able to arbitrarily nest deeper=
levels. Comments appreciated.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><A href=3D"https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/242">https://github.co=
m/bitcoin/bips/pull/242</A></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>- Eric</DIV></SPAN></BODY></HTML>
--------=_MBECF4C1A7-5E56-4DB8-A11A-F643DB5BF451--