Re: [bitcoindev] Relax OP_RETURN standardness restrictions

["Sjors Provoost" <sjors@sprovoost.nl>]

> >> As for your earlier proposals (Ordisrespector, etc), they were not 
>> useful in general, because they rely too heavily on having 
>> standardness rules go against financial incentives. Only consensus 
>> changes can work, but so far you haven't proposed those.
>
> That's nonsense. They were and continue to be very effective, even with 
> only a small amount of adoption.

Further, mining centralization and 
> pools denying miners options has been the biggest barrier to that 
> adoption. There is no significant financial impact either, that's just 
> FUD; miners using the fixed and improved spam filters have in fact 
> earned significantly more than miners using Core.

I'll reply to your arguments when Ocean Pool reorgs a competitor block with inscriptions in it.

- Sjors

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/f348e4bf-ccc4-48e3-9745-ac72b1b131f5%40app.fastmail.com.