public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Schildbach <andreas@schildbach.de>
To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Feedback requested: "reject" p2p message
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 10:26:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <l4lajm$3ga$1@ger.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <526DD18A.7060201@jerviss.org>

HTTP also defines success codes (2xx). Are we also talking about ACK
messages now, rather than just REJECT messages?


On 10/28/2013 03:52 AM, kjj wrote:
> Any reason not to use actual HTTP codes?  I'm not aware of any major
> deficiency in them.  Most of them won't apply to us, which is fine, they
> don't seem to apply to HTTP either.  We can extend the scheme on our own
> if we find a good reason to.
> 
> That implies 16 bits, or a varint.  I would avoid a string or varstring
> here; we already have a text field.  Varint vs. 16 bits is a minor
> issue, and arguments can be made in both directions.  I flipped a coin
> and got heads, so I'll say varint.
> 
> Gavin Andresen wrote:
>> RE: use HTTP-like status codes:
>>
>> Okey dokey, I'll add a one-byte machine-readable HTTP-like status
>> code. Unless y'all want a 32-bit status code.  Or maybe a varint. Or a
>> three-character numeric string. I really and truly don't care, but I
>> am writing this code right now so whatever you want, decide quickly.
>>
>> If anybody has strong feelings about what the reject categories should
>> be, then please take the time to write a specific list, I can't read
>> your mind....
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> --
>> Gavin Andresen
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> October Webinars: Code for Performance
>> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
>> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
>> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Bitcoin-development mailing list
>> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> October Webinars: Code for Performance
> Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
> Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
> the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60135991&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
> 





  reply	other threads:[~2013-10-28  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-10-26  0:34 [Bitcoin-development] Feedback requested: "reject" p2p message Gavin Andresen
2013-10-26  1:01 ` Jean-Paul Kogelman
2013-10-26  2:00   ` Gavin
2013-10-26  4:32     ` kjj
2013-10-27 14:32       ` Mike Hearn
2013-10-27 14:39         ` Luke-Jr
2013-10-27 14:50           ` Mike Hearn
2013-10-30 17:13         ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-10-31 12:01           ` Mike Hearn
2013-10-27 22:52       ` Gavin Andresen
2013-10-28  2:52         ` kjj
2013-10-28  9:26           ` Andreas Schildbach [this message]
2013-10-28  9:32             ` Gregory Maxwell
2013-10-29  5:37               ` Gavin Andresen
2013-10-29  8:55                 ` Warren Togami Jr.
2013-10-29  9:12                   ` Peter Todd
2013-10-29  9:52                 ` Mike Hearn
2013-10-29 10:14                   ` Peter Todd
2013-10-29 11:38                     ` Peter Todd
2013-10-29 12:32                       ` Mike Hearn
2013-10-29 16:35                         ` [Bitcoin-development] On soft-forks and hard-forks Peter Todd
2013-10-30  2:01                         ` [Bitcoin-development] Feedback requested: "reject" p2p message Gavin Andresen
2013-10-30  8:24                           ` Mike Hearn
2013-10-30  9:05                             ` Mark Friedenbach
2013-10-30 10:26                               ` Mike Hearn
2013-10-28  2:59         ` Luke-Jr
2013-10-28  3:02         ` Pieter Wuille

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='l4lajm$3ga$1@ger.gmane.org' \
    --to=andreas@schildbach.de \
    --cc=bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox