From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.191] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoW0-0003J6-Rb for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:31:28 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org; Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by sog-mx-1.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WFoVz-0005UD-Dr for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:31:28 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WFoVo-0001kU-GA for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:31:16 +0100 Received: from f052085125.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.52.85.125]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:31:16 +0100 Received: from andreas by f052085125.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:31:16 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net From: Andreas Schildbach Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 18:31:04 +0100 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: f052085125.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.1 DKIM_ADSP_ALL No valid author signature, domain signs all mail -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.6 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1WFoVz-0005UD-Dr Subject: [Bitcoin-development] BIP70 proposed changes X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:31:29 -0000 I'm starting a thread on proposed changes on BIP70 based on my experience in implementing the payment protocol in Bitcoin Wallet: - certificate chain in pki_data: I think it should be required that is most contain the first certificate PLUS all intermediate certificates (if any), but NOT the root certificate. Reason: We want to be able to verify offline. - definition of timezone: Its not clear if times (e.g. expires) are in UTC or local. I suggest to require UTC. If if we can't agree on this, there should be a sentence about timezones in the spec. (probably more to be added...)