From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-1.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WR1Fm-0000lH-B2 for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:21:02 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org; Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WR1Fl-0002LG-3C for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:21:02 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WR1Fd-0003TY-Fj for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:20:53 +0100 Received: from e179064016.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.179.64.16]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:20:53 +0100 Received: from andreas by e179064016.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:20:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net From: Andreas Schildbach Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 16:20:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: e179064016.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 X-Spam-Score: -0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.1 DKIM_ADSP_ALL No valid author signature, domain signs all mail -0.0 T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record X-Headers-End: 1WR1Fl-0002LG-3C Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol for Face-to-face Payments X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2014 15:21:02 -0000 On 03/21/2014 02:54 PM, Alex Kotenko wrote: > > I wonder how complex it would be to implement HTTP-over-Bluetooth. Not > > like I'm willing to do that now, but HTTP is well known and proven > to be > > quite good for tasks like this, so in theory it would be handy to have > > such capacities in here. > > Thought of that as well. On the other hand, HTTP might be overkill and > we inherit its potential downsides as well. > > ​It definitely is an overkill. Don't think we should do it now unless we > will see later during implementation that we really have to. Btw. we could also consider SPDY. I'm not sure about the advantages, but its probably quicker and leaner.