From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com ([172.29.43.193] helo=mx.sourceforge.net) by sfs-ml-4.v29.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WSx88-00012E-NQ for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:21:08 +0000 Received-SPF: pass (sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com: domain of m.gmane.org designates 80.91.229.3 as permitted sender) client-ip=80.91.229.3; envelope-from=gcbd-bitcoin-development@m.gmane.org; helo=plane.gmane.org; Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by sog-mx-3.v43.ch3.sourceforge.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76) id 1WSx87-00034n-Et for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:21:08 +0000 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WSx80-0006Kg-AC for bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:21:00 +0100 Received: from f053008027.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.53.8.27]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:21:00 +0100 Received: from andreas by f053008027.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:21:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net From: Andreas Schildbach Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 00:20:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20140320215208.GC88006@giles.gnomon.org.uk> <20140326224826.GE62995@giles.gnomon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: f053008027.adsl.alicedsl.de User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 X-Spam-Score: -0.8 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam Filtering performed by mx.sourceforge.net. See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details. -1.5 SPF_CHECK_PASS SPF reports sender host as permitted sender for sender-domain -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no trust [80.91.229.3 listed in list.dnswl.org] -0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS SPF: HELO matches SPF record 1.1 DKIM_ADSP_ALL No valid author signature, domain signs all mail -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record -0.4 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain X-Headers-End: 1WSx87-00034n-Et Subject: Re: [Bitcoin-development] Payment Protocol for Face-to-face Payments X-BeenThere: bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 23:21:08 -0000 But these cases are the norm, rather than the exception. Of all these places I spend my money at during the day I hardly ever know their official name. I'm thinking in terms of "bakery", "indian restaurant" or "snack vending machine". In Germany usually businesses are named like the people that run it. That usually just one or two random family names plus the legal form of the company. On 03/26/2014 11:56 PM, Mike Hearn wrote: > Yeah, for those cases we'd need to think of something else. That gets > into the realm of creating our own infrastructure though ... > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > _______________________________________________ > Bitcoin-development mailing list > Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development >