public inbox for bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List" <bitcoindev@googlegroups.com>
To: Murch <murch@murch.one>
Cc: bitcoindev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [bitcoindev] CHECKSIGFROMSTACK(VERIFY/ADD)
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 15:33:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <nRFLHRhwXER56TrZy50tJ2HmvipjteXzPfz6mEs_VmyZ5sXDNVUIUniPppSphF5SOVCQmpRZSjmBN8_eIMZEbdFgl3vJn-8XSEmpAFmj5SM=@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c91269ac-e579-4089-bf9a-fdc076e34727@murch.one>

To add to Murch's point, from my experience working with Script in general and
trying to estimate the cost of validation of legacy script as part of the
consensus cleanup in particular, i think we should refrain from modifying legacy
Script and further complicate reasoning about the worst case unless strictly
necessary.

Best,
Antoine

On Friday, November 15th, 2024 at 9:57 AM, Murch <murch@murch.one> wrote:

> Hi everyone,
> 
> On 2024-11-14 17:02, Brandon Black wrote:
> 
> > * Should CHECKSIGFROMSTACKVERIFY (CSFSV) be added to pre-tapscript
> > […]
> > My personal thinking in initially including CSFSV in earlier script versions was basically that it's compatible with NOP forking, so why not.
> 
> 
> If there is no compelling use case or concrete benefit, I don’t think "it’s compatible, why not" is convincing motivation, especially at the cost of a NOP.
> 
> On 2024-11-14 17:02, Brandon Black wrote:
> 
> > * Should we include CHECKSIGFROMSTACKADD?
> 
> 
> I feel similar about this. If there is currently no demand for this, and future demand also seems unlikely, I would prefer a smaller, more focused set of changes.
> 
> Cheers,
> Murch
> 
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/c91269ac-e579-4089-bf9a-fdc076e34727%40murch.one.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Bitcoin Development Mailing List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to bitcoindev+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/bitcoindev/nRFLHRhwXER56TrZy50tJ2HmvipjteXzPfz6mEs_VmyZ5sXDNVUIUniPppSphF5SOVCQmpRZSjmBN8_eIMZEbdFgl3vJn-8XSEmpAFmj5SM%3D%40protonmail.com.


      reply	other threads:[~2024-11-15 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-14 22:02 [bitcoindev] CHECKSIGFROMSTACK(VERIFY/ADD) Brandon Black
2024-11-15 10:14 ` 'moonsettler' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List
2024-11-15 14:57 ` Murch
2024-11-15 15:33   ` 'Antoine Poinsot' via Bitcoin Development Mailing List [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='nRFLHRhwXER56TrZy50tJ2HmvipjteXzPfz6mEs_VmyZ5sXDNVUIUniPppSphF5SOVCQmpRZSjmBN8_eIMZEbdFgl3vJn-8XSEmpAFmj5SM=@protonmail.com' \
    --to=bitcoindev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=darosior@protonmail.com \
    --cc=murch@murch.one \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox