[bitcoin-dev] bitcoinj fork with Taproot support

[bitcoin-dev] bitcoinj fork with Taproot support

[n1ms0s]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 802 bytes --]

Hello all,
I am currently working on a fork of bitcoinj with basic Taproot support. Currently it supports basic sending and receiving with Taproot addresses using a bitcoinj SPV wallet.
See here: https://github.com/n1ms0s/bitcoinj

It supports the above along with public/private key tweaking. Feel free to take a look, and leave feedback or even work on it yourself and submit a pull request.

One issue I am running into right now though is when broadcasting a Taproot transaction to older nodes (old as in ~0.18.0) I get an error response of "Witness version reserved for soft-fork upgrades". Anyone have any idea why this happens? I have a stackexchange question open here for it:
https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/110787/issue-when-broadcasting-taproot-transaction-to-older-nodes

n1ms0s

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1250 bytes --]

Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoinj fork with Taproot support

[n1ms0s]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 871 bytes --]

This seems to be the case. I saw your reply on Bitcoin StackExchange as well. In bitcoinj I just made it so the client only connects to nodes with at least protocol version 70016. Seems to work well.

‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Wednesday, November 17, 2021 7:00 PM, Pieter Wuille via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> On Wednesday, November 17th, 2021 at 1:07 PM, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
>> Prior to 0.19.0, creating outputs with an unknown witness version was considered non-standard. This was a violation of BIP 173 and was fixed for 0.19.0+ in PR #15846.
>
> That's correct, but I think OP's problem is with getting P2TR _spends_ to relay. Those will be rejected by all post-segwit pre-taproot Bitcoin Core releases, as far as I know.
>
> --
> Pieter

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1219 bytes --]

Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoinj fork with Taproot support

[Pieter Wuille]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 478 bytes --]

On Wednesday, November 17th, 2021 at 1:07 PM, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:

> Prior to 0.19.0, creating outputs with an unknown witness version was considered non-standard. This was a violation of BIP 173 and was fixed for 0.19.0+ in PR #15846.

That's correct, but I think OP's problem is with getting P2TR _spends_ to relay. Those will be rejected by all post-segwit pre-taproot Bitcoin Core releases, as far as I know.

--
Pieter

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 683 bytes --]

Re: [bitcoin-dev] bitcoinj fork with Taproot support

[Andrew Chow]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1042 bytes --]

Prior to 0.19.0, creating outputs with an unknown witness version was considered non-standard. This was a violation of BIP 173 and was fixed for 0.19.0+ in PR #15846.

On 11/16/2021 10:17 PM, n1ms0s via bitcoin-dev wrote:

> Hello all,
> I am currently working on a fork of bitcoinj with basic Taproot support. Currently it supports basic sending and receiving with Taproot addresses using a bitcoinj SPV wallet.
> See here: https://github.com/n1ms0s/bitcoinj
>
> It supports the above along with public/private key tweaking. Feel free to take a look, and leave feedback or even work on it yourself and submit a pull request.
>
> One issue I am running into right now though is when broadcasting a Taproot transaction to older nodes (old as in ~0.18.0) I get an error response of "Witness version reserved for soft-fork upgrades". Anyone have any idea why this happens? I have a stackexchange question open here for it:
> https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/110787/issue-when-broadcasting-taproot-transaction-to-older-nodes
>
> n1ms0s

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2360 bytes --]