From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (smtp1.linux-foundation.org [172.17.192.35]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4074FCD9 for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:03:51 +0000 (UTC) X-Greylist: domain auto-whitelisted by SQLgrey-1.7.6 Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) by smtp1.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87BF2FD for ; Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [188.166.127.96] by 3capp-mailcom-bs16.server.lan (via HTTP); Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:03:44 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: From: "cipher anthem" To: hearn@vinumeris.com Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 18:03:44 +0200 Importance: normal Sensitivity: Normal In-Reply-To: References: <55F9E47D.50507@mattcorallo.com> <55FC6EBF.9090504@mattcorallo.com>, X-UI-Message-Type: mail X-Priority: 3 X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:vtstUu9kUwsDxZSCvcOUc6k7z+whtTdmNKmGKpoY3aw aQ2fKSTRmqROq+O1TlexvQ+yPJTGcvQCB9xKrae1l6LcKHpYwQ GCHUgfVXhr+eG1YYqNaqYzhHXCeL0qyeaMFYG71ltNq7Kx7e+P QPE5x2BV0ZUMNBEhmOw34WCwlXJ4jiNMfAJh5V3Knm0Dx4Hg2K wz1oRI7R5KghfVxuB9Rp/lDBg2GF08lByRr5M/H4X8aDKLwxDd JezFrOCATd+Wpatc7OuZ388S21qyIlcBg4u+/sWCcjqaOzHzC3 SOVgaMx7gdtrzw9irMadnMAkotN X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:6wPUPD3ARz0=:ljPFDK7KVJ68ziw9EYYB96 +zIwVOqKZZbASbpKlOLnbqz+LRgiYdS0lPN1RKgmMT9BzsTLqAH8/KNiomoO5TPBo1E0wKT22 pbunkhPac3Q7TpuogPUMm6aBcCeRoyBJLu5ADDCgimeTiFqwhGgHEbxlqo5CPLlmkrmA3033B OnK7+f4aYx2tgvpJQOnPEkuZcSVpN33CYKnjHf4p4Oq9PKUiobj60kisNaCQiRiC4ieoD2JI4 gNN8tU2kbLhsB+ktrYVkBxV9HNHj2yvHzD78ILB+G6QCn19zUZThpC55GC6nGCDkBpp6Bj1Tp ffzZdwQQgG0Vq95PEzyC2zvECcKfxHfbxYJIeVvIu4+q9xbFoiFreaYzWkPSrSM+78mSLoeQk S4LntnXVrR/rs9R5M1Zx2MYGVfLoFO+kASP37Pc+ybVRXAUD+1mg8NLa0UMVE4PXcCIENJoun O3sg8dOsWg== X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, HTML_MESSAGE, MIME_HTML_ONLY, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on smtp1.linux-foundation.org Cc: Bitcoin development mailing list Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling Bitcoin conference micro-report X-BeenThere: bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Bitcoin Development Discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2015 16:03:51 -0000

Let me get this straight. You start this whole debate with a "kick the can down the road" proposal to increase the block size to 20MB, which obviously would require another hard fork in the future, but if someone else proposes a similar "kicka the can" proposal you will outright reject it?

Now that the majority have clearly rejected your and Gavin's proposal you decide to act like a 2-year old and reject any solution which isn't your own? Why dont you go sulk in a corner somewhere? Luckily Gavin is a more level-headed and reasonable person than you.

Sent: Friday, September 18, 2015 at 10:33 PM
From: "Mike Hearn via bitcoin-dev" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Matt Corallo" <lf-lists@mattcorallo.com>
Cc: "Bitcoin development mailing list" <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Scaling Bitcoin conference micro-report

Any change that results in this happening all over again in a few years does not have consensus.

_______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev