From: Robert Spigler <RobertSpigler@protonmail.ch>
To: Bitcoin Protocol Discussion <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: SomberNight <somber.night@protonmail.com>
Subject: Re: [bitcoin-dev] Signature and Script Independent Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets.
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 21:42:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uASNM8tOf1FvSUQe6hjlURtgKrnmaF-XNTd5F0KyULurLyk5K-fz9KDWm6Am27pgI4GSysEOepJ7o77V_ghqvaqsc0uyBDwte_peCZuXKko=@protonmail.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <oIgV5u9J6iyoWCDtouomT3mNi6D5cxXjOgIWNYiZ_uQIqd2FksfvkIDvAEbdE9L37tAIGAC3QUxzyfBrDYtleBEX80WAO7O6CQNjniE6Omc=@protonmail.ch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 981 bytes --]
(IMO), where this proposal really excels, is mutlisig. And if you check my commits, it actually originally was for multisig only, and I extended it for multisig and single sig wallets.
ghost43 and Jochen Hoenicke brought up important issues with this proposed BIP re: single sig wallets, so I will be reverting this back for multisig derivations. I believe that should cover all concerns.
Please view the updated BIP here: https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/blob/Sane_Mulitisg_deriv/Modern%20Hierarchy%20for%20Deterministic%20Multisignature%20Wallets.mediawiki
And the updated PR here: https://github.com/Rspigler/bips-1/pull/1
Thank you,
Robert
Personal Fingerprint: BF0D 3C08 A439 5AC6 11C1 5395 B70B 4A77 F850 548F
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
On Thursday, March 18, 2021 4:44 PM, Robert Spigler via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> I (Robert Spigler) will respond in a next post.
>
> Thanks for your comments!
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1823 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-18 21:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-14 15:13 [bitcoin-dev] Signature and Script Independent Hierarchy for Deterministic Wallets SomberNight
2021-03-14 20:46 ` Robert Spigler
2021-03-17 7:26 ` Craig Raw
2021-03-18 15:29 ` Jochen Hoenicke
2021-03-18 20:44 ` Robert Spigler
2021-03-18 21:42 ` Robert Spigler [this message]
2021-03-19 7:54 ` Craig Raw
2021-03-19 8:59 ` Robert Spigler
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-14 1:51 Robert Spigler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='uASNM8tOf1FvSUQe6hjlURtgKrnmaF-XNTd5F0KyULurLyk5K-fz9KDWm6Am27pgI4GSysEOepJ7o77V_ghqvaqsc0uyBDwte_peCZuXKko=@protonmail.ch' \
--to=robertspigler@protonmail.ch \
--cc=bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=somber.night@protonmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox